| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Jan 20, 2008 Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:55 am
Post subject: Still playing with HDR Archived from groups: rec>photo>equipment>35mm, others (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 05, 2008 Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 3:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Still playing with HDR [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 05, 2004 Posts: 1310
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:27 am
Post subject: Re: Still playing with HDR [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"The One" <someone@here> wrote in message
news:47ceb65b_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> "Father McKenzie" <father_mckenzie.DeleteThis@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:61ljuaF1smcasU1@mid.individual.net...
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/silvermoon/2266292417/sizes/l/
>>
>> A little bit more cloud would have been nice
>
> And foreground interest.
>
> I'm sorry HDR will always look unreal and unnatural, use filters instead
> or blend bracketed shots manually.
>
> Letting a pc decide on whats best doesn't work!
>
> You are the photographer YOU do the processing.
I think you are missing the point of HDR (bad name really) , it is a
technique used to get a particular end result, not to produce something that
looks like what the photographer saw when he pressed the shutter. >> Stay informed about: Still playing with HDR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 27, 2006 Posts: 170
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:27 am
Post subject: Re: Still playing with HDR [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Pete D wrote:
> "The One" <someone@here> wrote in message
> news:47ceb65b_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>> "Father McKenzie" <father_mckenzie DeleteThis @yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:61ljuaF1smcasU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/silvermoon/2266292417/sizes/l/
>>>
>>> A little bit more cloud would have been nice
>> And foreground interest.
>>
>> I'm sorry HDR will always look unreal and unnatural, use filters instead
>> or blend bracketed shots manually.
>>
>> Letting a pc decide on whats best doesn't work!
>>
>> You are the photographer YOU do the processing.
>
> I think you are missing the point of HDR (bad name really) , it is a
> technique used to get a particular end result, not to produce something that
> looks like what the photographer saw when he pressed the shutter.
>
>
They're not mutually exclusive. HDR is just another tool in the toolbox. >> Stay informed about: Still playing with HDR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 05, 2004 Posts: 1310
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:44 am
Post subject: Re: Still playing with HDR [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Pudentame" <no.one.RemoveThis@no.were.invalid> wrote in message
news:47cf2f0c$0$6121$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> Pete D wrote:
>> "The One" <someone@here> wrote in message
>> news:47ceb65b_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>> "Father McKenzie" <father_mckenzie.RemoveThis@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>> news:61ljuaF1smcasU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/silvermoon/2266292417/sizes/l/
>>>>
>>>> A little bit more cloud would have been nice
>>> And foreground interest.
>>>
>>> I'm sorry HDR will always look unreal and unnatural, use filters instead
>>> or blend bracketed shots manually.
>>>
>>> Letting a pc decide on whats best doesn't work!
>>>
>>> You are the photographer YOU do the processing.
>>
>> I think you are missing the point of HDR (bad name really) , it is a
>> technique used to get a particular end result, not to produce something
>> that looks like what the photographer saw when he pressed the shutter.
>
> They're not mutually exclusive. HDR is just another tool in the toolbox.
True of course but I do think that some shooters go just a little overboard
for my taste. >> Stay informed about: Still playing with HDR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 05, 2008 Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Still playing with HDR [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Pete D" <no.RemoveThis@email.com> wrote in message
news:47cf105e$0$23651$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "The One" <someone@here> wrote in message
> news:47ceb65b_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>
>> "Father McKenzie" <father_mckenzie.RemoveThis@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:61ljuaF1smcasU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/silvermoon/2266292417/sizes/l/
>>>
>>> A little bit more cloud would have been nice
>>
>> And foreground interest.
>>
>> I'm sorry HDR will always look unreal and unnatural, use filters instead
>> or blend bracketed shots manually.
>>
>> Letting a pc decide on whats best doesn't work!
>>
>> You are the photographer YOU do the processing.
>
> I think you are missing the point of HDR (bad name really) , it is a
> technique used to get a particular end result, not to produce something
> that looks like what the photographer saw when he pressed the shutter.
What is this end result then? >> Stay informed about: Still playing with HDR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 05, 2008 Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Still playing with HDR [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Pete D" <no.DeleteThis@email.com> wrote in message
news:47cf3e60$0$23622$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "Pudentame" <no.one.DeleteThis@no.were.invalid> wrote in message
> news:47cf2f0c$0$6121$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> Pete D wrote:
>>> "The One" <someone@here> wrote in message
>>> news:47ceb65b_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>> "Father McKenzie" <father_mckenzie.DeleteThis@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:61ljuaF1smcasU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/silvermoon/2266292417/sizes/l/
>>>>>
>>>>> A little bit more cloud would have been nice
>>>> And foreground interest.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry HDR will always look unreal and unnatural, use filters
>>>> instead or blend bracketed shots manually.
>>>>
>>>> Letting a pc decide on whats best doesn't work!
>>>>
>>>> You are the photographer YOU do the processing.
>>>
>>> I think you are missing the point of HDR (bad name really) , it is a
>>> technique used to get a particular end result, not to produce something
>>> that looks like what the photographer saw when he pressed the shutter.
>>
>> They're not mutually exclusive. HDR is just another tool in the toolbox.
>
> True of course but I do think that some shooters go just a little
> overboard for my taste.
From what I have seen on Flickr, ALL have. >> Stay informed about: Still playing with HDR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 27, 2006 Posts: 170
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Still playing with HDR [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
The One wrote:
> "Pete D" <no RemoveThis @email.com> wrote in message
> news:47cf105e$0$23651$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>> "The One" <someone@here> wrote in message
>> news:47ceb65b_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>> "Father McKenzie" <father_mckenzie RemoveThis @yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>> news:61ljuaF1smcasU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/silvermoon/2266292417/sizes/l/
>>>>
>>>> A little bit more cloud would have been nice
>>> And foreground interest.
>>>
>>> I'm sorry HDR will always look unreal and unnatural, use filters instead
>>> or blend bracketed shots manually.
>>>
>>> Letting a pc decide on whats best doesn't work!
>>>
>>> You are the photographer YOU do the processing.
>> I think you are missing the point of HDR (bad name really) , it is a
>> technique used to get a particular end result, not to produce something
>> that looks like what the photographer saw when he pressed the shutter.
>
> What is this end result then?
>
>
Whatever you want it to be. >> Stay informed about: Still playing with HDR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 03, 2008 Posts: 19
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 5:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Still playing with HDR [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Pete D" <no DeleteThis @email.com> wrote in message
news:47cf3e60$0$23622$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "Pudentame" <no.one DeleteThis @no.were.invalid> wrote in message
> news:47cf2f0c$0$6121$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> They're not mutually exclusive. HDR is just another tool in the toolbox.
>
> True of course but I do think that some shooters go just a little
> overboard for my taste.
It's the same with any new toy.
Remember solarization.
Remember posterization.
Remember your puberty?
--
Peter >> Stay informed about: Still playing with HDR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 27, 2006 Posts: 170
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 5:42 pm
Post subject: Re: Still playing with HDR [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Peter wrote:
> "Pete D" <no.RemoveThis@email.com> wrote in message
> news:47cf3e60$0$23622$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>
>> "Pudentame" <no.one.RemoveThis@no.were.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:47cf2f0c$0$6121$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
>>> They're not mutually exclusive. HDR is just another tool in the toolbox.
>>
>> True of course but I do think that some shooters go just a little
>> overboard for my taste.
>
> It's the same with any new toy.
> Remember solarization.
> Remember posterization.
> Remember your puberty?
>
Some things don't lose their allure as quickly as others. >> Stay informed about: Still playing with HDR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 05, 2004 Posts: 1310
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:23 am
Post subject: Re: Still playing with HDR [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Peter" <peternew RemoveThis @nospamoptonline.net> wrote in message
news:47d44ab9$0$13877$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com...
> "Pete D" <no RemoveThis @email.com> wrote in message
> news:47cf3e60$0$23622$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>
>> "Pudentame" <no.one RemoveThis @no.were.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:47cf2f0c$0$6121$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
>>> They're not mutually exclusive. HDR is just another tool in the toolbox.
>>
>> True of course but I do think that some shooters go just a little
>> overboard for my taste.
>
> It's the same with any new toy.
> Remember solarization.
> Remember posterization.
> Remember your puberty?
>
> --
> Peter
YEs!
Yes!
No, far to long ago! ;-( >> Stay informed about: Still playing with HDR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 05, 2008 Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:30 am
Post subject: Re: Still playing with HDR [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Pudentame" <no.one.DeleteThis@no.were.invalid> wrote in message
news:47d31265$0$6129$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> The One wrote:
>> "Pete D" <no.DeleteThis@email.com> wrote in message
>> news:47cf105e$0$23651$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>> "The One" <someone@here> wrote in message
>>> news:47ceb65b_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>> "Father McKenzie" <father_mckenzie.DeleteThis@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>>> news:61ljuaF1smcasU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/silvermoon/2266292417/sizes/l/
>>>>>
>>>>> A little bit more cloud would have been nice
>>>> And foreground interest.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry HDR will always look unreal and unnatural, use filters
>>>> instead or blend bracketed shots manually.
>>>>
>>>> Letting a pc decide on whats best doesn't work!
>>>>
>>>> You are the photographer YOU do the processing.
>>> I think you are missing the point of HDR (bad name really) , it is a
>>> technique used to get a particular end result, not to produce something
>>> that looks like what the photographer saw when he pressed the shutter.
>>
>> What is this end result then?
>
> Whatever you want it to be.
Anything other than a photograph then. >> Stay informed about: Still playing with HDR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 27, 2006 Posts: 170
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 11:04 am
Post subject: Re: Still playing with HDR [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
The One wrote:
> "Pudentame" <no.one.RemoveThis@no.were.invalid> wrote in message
> news:47d31265$0$6129$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> The One wrote:
>>> "Pete D" <no.RemoveThis@email.com> wrote in message
>>> news:47cf105e$0$23651$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>>> "The One" <someone@here> wrote in message
>>>> news:47ceb65b_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>>> "Father McKenzie" <father_mckenzie.RemoveThis@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>> news:61ljuaF1smcasU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/silvermoon/2266292417/sizes/l/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A little bit more cloud would have been nice
>>>>> And foreground interest.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sorry HDR will always look unreal and unnatural, use filters
>>>>> instead or blend bracketed shots manually.
>>>>>
>>>>> Letting a pc decide on whats best doesn't work!
>>>>>
>>>>> You are the photographer YOU do the processing.
>>>> I think you are missing the point of HDR (bad name really) , it is a
>>>> technique used to get a particular end result, not to produce something
>>>> that looks like what the photographer saw when he pressed the shutter.
>>> What is this end result then?
>> Whatever you want it to be.
>
> Anything other than a photograph then.
>
>
If that's what you want. >> Stay informed about: Still playing with HDR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 05, 2008 Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Still playing with HDR [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Pudentame" <no.one.TakeThisOut@no.were.invalid> wrote in message
news:47dd376b$0$6498$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> The One wrote:
>> "Pudentame" <no.one.TakeThisOut@no.were.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:47d31265$0$6129$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>>> The One wrote:
>>>> "Pete D" <no.TakeThisOut@email.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:47cf105e$0$23651$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>>>> "The One" <someone@here> wrote in message
>>>>> news:47ceb65b_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>>>> "Father McKenzie" <father_mckenzie.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:61ljuaF1smcasU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/silvermoon/2266292417/sizes/l/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A little bit more cloud would have been nice
>>>>>> And foreground interest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm sorry HDR will always look unreal and unnatural, use filters
>>>>>> instead or blend bracketed shots manually.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Letting a pc decide on whats best doesn't work!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are the photographer YOU do the processing.
>>>>> I think you are missing the point of HDR (bad name really) , it is a
>>>>> technique used to get a particular end result, not to produce
>>>>> something that looks like what the photographer saw when he pressed
>>>>> the shutter.
>>>> What is this end result then?
>>> Whatever you want it to be.
>>
>> Anything other than a photograph then.
>
> If that's what you want.
And how many times do I see these claiming to be photographs. >> Stay informed about: Still playing with HDR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |