On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:04:23 -0500, rafeb <rafe.RemoveThis@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
>bnjlosh wrote:
>
>> I have started scanning my negatives with an epson 3170 and I was
>> wondering if there is any loss of image quality when getting these
>> printed out vs a print made directly from the negative...just
>> wondering...
>
>
>Yes, if you're scanning with a 3170 you're
>missing a good deal of detail.
>
>Now, whether that detail will appear in a
>tradional optical print is a different
>question, and will depend on the skill
>of whoever's making the print.
>
>Bottom line, and Epson 3170 is not a terribly
>good film scanner. You can do much better.
>but it will cost you.
>
>
I've scanned 6x6 film on the lower level Epson, the 2450, and then
printed digitally at roughly 8x10 with no problems. I've only done a
few prints -- via digital photo print firms on the Net -- but the
results have been perfectly adequate.
However, I wouldn't want to have gone a lot higher in size as the
scans were definitely 'softer' than I'd have liked.
Matt<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: film scanning quality