In message 20071218183442.489F.0.NOFFLE.TakeThisOut@ID-107770.user.individual.net,
Whiskers Proclaimed from the tallest tower:
> On 2007-12-18, ChrisM wrote:
>> In message
>> 20071216120515.1CF8.2.NOFFLE.TakeThisOut@ID-107770.user.individual.net, Whiskers
>> Proclaimed from the tallest tower:
>>
>> <Snip!>
>>> ...But if you're serious about taking pictures for
>>> catalogues you won't want to use a point-and-shoot camera anyway,
>>> will you, ...
>>>
>>
>> Why not? A decent P&S camera could give perfectly adequate pictures
>> for a catalogue.
>
> I suppose it depends on what you want the catalogue to tell
> prospective customers; if it's 'this lot don't spend much on their
> catalogue' then perhaps you'll get away with it.
>
> Commercial photographers don't spend thousands of pounds setting up
> studios and getting really good cameras and lenses and years gaining
> experience and building up a clientel, just for the heck of it; but
> an experienced skillful photographer might manage to get a picture
> from a point and shoot digital camera that would pass muster for a
> 'thumbnail' in a catalogue.
>
> (No, I'm not a pro).
Depends on the catalogue though really, doesn't it. Ok, if it was some
glamerous fashion thing, with professional models, fancy backgrounds and
sophisticated lighting, you would probably need professional equipment and
photographer.
If you were making an aircraft hardware catalogue, and just needed some
pictures of some bolts and screws to illustrate the part numbers, a £150
point and shoot would probably be good enough.
When the OP mentioned catalogue was used in the same sentence as Year Book,
I made the assumption it was not a huge expensive glossy fashion catalogue
that they were talking about. Maybe I was wrong...(?)
--
Regards,
Chris.
(Remove Elvis's shoes to email me)
>> Stay informed about: digital shutter cable