tbrown wrote:
> I'm cheap and don't like to pollute more than I have to, so I use
> developer until I've processed what the maker says it can. I have 2
> liters of D-76 in which I've developed 30 4x5 sheets so far. Kodak
> sites 32 as the maximum (4 8x10 sheets per liter). I have 2 sheets
> left, which is not worth my time since the tank holds 10. I also have
2
> rolls of T-max 120. In what way does image quality degrade? Is there
> some way to pre-treat developer before dumping it? Neutralize ph, put
> it in the sun?
>
> When increasing dev time to compensate for exhaustion, is the 15%
> increase compounded? I would think so, eg 10 min, 11.5 min, 13.2,
15.2
> (compounded) as opposed to 10, 11.5, 13, 14.5 (additive). It's not a
> huge difference, and well below my error in dunk/pour time, but I'm
> still curious. Why does Kodak say not to reuse diluted developer,
even
> in the same sitting?
I realized after reading this again that I missed the last question.
Some diluted developer can be used again and can even be replenished.
DK-50, a developer put up in packages until recently, is an example. I
suspect Kodak recommends against re-using diluted D-76 because there
might not be enough sulfite in it to withstand exposure to the air
_and_ continue to protect the remaining developing agents against
oxidation. If its used in a relatively short time I suspect that D-76
diluted 1:1 will work fine for a second roll of film proveded the time
is extended. At higher dilution its about at its capacity anyway. Kodak
does not recommend 1:3 dilution for D-76 but Ilford does for ID-11
which is virtually identical.
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles CA, USA
dickburk.RemoveThis@ix.netcom.com<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: What happens as developer nears exhaustion?