|
Related Topics:
| minimum shutter speeds - I know that with my 35mm camera, my minimum shutter speed for handheld should be 1/focal length (e.g. for a 200mm lens, minimum would be 1/200sec) but I have seen several on the web to the fact that this is different in MF..
Electronic Shutters - A Whole Bunch Better? - I'm a 99% convert to camera shutters. Should I be? Is one brand of as good as the next? Do they remain accurate? How durable are they? Dan
New strobes for focal plane shutters - Canon has what they call their FP flashes (a misnomer in my opinion) and Minolta has their HSS flashes. These flashes are supposed to sync at high speeds by using a sequence of pulses. I've read that this approach is only usable with vertical travel FP.
Fixing Slow Shutter Speeds on Rolleicord - As I've mentioned several times I just got my first medium format, a VA Type 2 TLR. Test shots show it to work great. One thing slower shutter speeds, 1/4 or less, obviously aren't accurate. They are much too slow. I'd say 1 second..
Focal plane vs. leaf shutters in MF SLRs - I was cleaning my RZ and began wondering why each lens must its own leaf shutter, then began wondering why we find leaf shutters only in lenses. I why the shutter has to be in the lens for systems (proxmity of
|
|
|
Next: G-Claron single cell use
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Aug 16, 2007 Posts: 8
|
(Msg. 16) Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:28 am
Post subject: Re: About central (diaphragm) shutters at high speeds/large apertures [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: rec>photo>equipment>medium-format (more info?)
|
|
|
On 20 août, 06:23, Peter <pir....RemoveThis@ktb.net> wrote:
>
> The problem can only arise if you are using fast film (Say EI 100
> or faster) in full daylight. The shutter makers didn't think you
> would normally be doing that, and certainly not with reversal
> film. If you were shooting 32 speed Ektachrome, you would
> never run in to the problem - at 1/500 second you would be using
> f/4 under full sun.
>
> Nowadays EI 100 is a normal speed for reversal film, and if you
> shoot under full sunlight, you may have to keep shutter efficiency
> in mind.
Definitely...
I take the opportunity of this thread for another question: some time
ago I read in an old manual that transmission losses in lenses without
multicoating were not negligible... I remember something like 30%
losses for a 4-element lens (Tessar). Can someone confirm that ?
>
> I've never shot B&W reversal in a still camera. What film and
> processing are you using?
Actually I used to shot with Agfa Scala, which is now discontinued.
I still have some rolls, however, and some stores still have some
also. I do not process it on my own, but rather send them to a lab (a
single one in France is still processing this film).
--
pehache >> Stay informed about: About central (diaphragm) shutters at high speeds/large ap.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 18, 2007 Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 17) Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 10:47 am
Post subject: Re: About central (diaphragm) shutters at high speeds/large apertures [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Aug 20, 12:28 pm, pehache-tolai <pehach... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:>
>
> I take the opportunity of this thread for another question: some time
> ago I read in an old manual that transmission losses in lenses without
> multicoating were not negligible... I remember something like 30%
> losses for a 4-element lens (Tessar). Can someone confirm that ?
For an uncoated lens with six air-glass surfaces
(as in a Tessar or other lens with three groups)
you get around 74% transmission (0.95^6),
of image forming light so your figure is about right.
A single coated Tessar will pass more than 90%
of the light (say 0.985^6).
But, some of the reflected light hits the film in the form
of flare, so in practice your exposure hardly changes
at all. The exposure recommendations for Kodachrome
did not change with the advent of coated lenses.
The case may be different in complex lenses with
more than 3 groups, but with Triplets, Tessars and
Sonnars it is close enough not to matter.
Even the difference between 74% (for uncoated)
and 90% (for single coated) is less than a third-stop,
and since at least some of the reflected light does appear
as flare, one shouldn't expect very much exposure
difference.
> Actually I used to shot with Agfa Scala, which is now discontinued.
It is too late for me to try Scala now. I have been planning to try
my own reversal processing, but I have never got around to it.
Peter.
--
pirwin DeleteThis @ktb.net >> Stay informed about: About central (diaphragm) shutters at high speeds/large ap.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|