argon3.DeleteThis@aol.com (Argon3) wrote in message news:<20040203093815.24764.00001350.DeleteThis@mb-m16.aol.com>...
> You might check out the Hardigg Storm cases...I've been looking at them as an
> alternative to a Pelican case. They have several models that are available as
> "rolling suitcase" configurations and they recently made a set of dividers
> available as an alterntive to a diced foam interior. You may have to go some
> to get one of the companies that handle these cases to "turn you on" to the
> divider system as it is brand new and they don't seem to be aware of it yet.
> Try cases4less.com or cases2go.com to find them.
> They also have the advantage of coming in several colors...so either
> high-visibility yellow or orange or olive drab are options.
>
> argon
Thanks for the advice. The Hardigg Storm cases look like they've got
a lot of latches on them. Have you seen one in person?
The case turns out to be a vexing problem. Now I know why the 6x9
format is getting popular. Must be a lot of Arca-Swiss architecture
shooters who have figured this out, however.
The Lightware V4300 looks like it will hold the camera upside-down on
the rail, but the leftover interior space will be 18" deep (the
exterior is 21" high), which is not ideal. As much as I like the idea
of a fully assembled camera, I'd be fishing accessories out of a deep
black well. About $400 at B&H. Lightware has an even bigger case,
the V4001, that comes with a removeable "cradle box" -- anyone use
one? -- but the exterior of the case is 27Lx17.5Wx21H" (i.e., bulky)
and it's $446. Neither case has wheels. Pelican's 1620 would also
hold a fully assembled Arca 4x5 upside-down, and it does have wheels,
but it's even bigger, with exterior dimensions of roughly 25Lx19W
x14H. It's $267 with a divider set at all-pelican-cases-4-less.com.
Next most efficient option would seem to be removing the lens and
sliding the two standards onto one half of the upper rail, which would
give me a 12x9x6" shape to store. Laying the compressed camera on its
side would leave more space in the rest of the case, but then I would
need a case that is 9" deep on the interior, which is not a popular
size. (Many cases are 8 1/2" deep, however. Go figure.) The options
at the 9" depth seem to be the LowePro Pro Roller 3, which has an
interior size of 22Lx17Wx9D and an exterior size of 24.5Lx25Wx14D
(width includes a removeable tripod holder), $340 at B&H; and the
Pelican 1610, exterior dimensions 24.5Lx19.5Wx12H and interior
demensions of 22.25Lx17Wx10.5H, $194 with a divider set at
all-pelican-cases-4-less.com.
The last option is laying the camera flat with the ground-glass up.
That orientation would open up a lot of case options, but it would
carve a 12x9" rectangle out the case, which is a lot of real estate.
Pieter's conversion of a tool box is ingenious and economical, but I'm
still hoping for an off-the-shelf solution.
-- Barry<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Best non-backpack carrying case for monorail 4x5 (Arca-Swi..