|
Related Topics:
| Nikon 5700 and image quality - I'm new to digital having jumped right in and bought this 5700 last spring. I was into when I was a teenager way back in the 70's, but it was too expensive a hobby and I did nothing but vacation snaps with film..
Question about CoolPix 8800 - Hope I am in the right group this time. I would like to know if you have tried the Coolpix 8800. I know it is a new camera, but would like to have some first hand opinions. If you have a Coolpix 8700, that would be close enough. Thanks
S1 components - Wondering if anyone would have about parts or Canon S1. I am looking for the lens cap, strap, lens Thanks in advance, Sam
WTF is a "zlr" camera ? - I first heard this term a week ago and then this news group shows up on my server. What does stand for ? -- a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m ----
Narrowing the Search - I have the Coolpix 8800 from my list and am now left with the Minolta Dimage A2 and the Panasonic FZ20. The that I find are as follows: A2 has 8 up to 800 ISO, a 28 - 200 zoom with macro on both ends, goes to F11; ..
|
|
|
Next: Digital Zoom: Panasonic FZ Books or Articles
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Oct 28, 2004 Posts: 604
|
(Msg. 16) Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 2:40 pm
Post subject: Re: The ZLRs I own Nikon 5700 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital>zlr (more info?)
|
|
|
All Things Mopar wrote:
[]
> While on the subject of "fat fingers", I'm *always*
> accidently putting my finger on the litte button on the
> side of the camera that controls the JPEG compression.
> Sometimes I don't spot that I've accidently switched from
> "fine" to "normal" or "basic" until I've taken a bunch of
> ruined shots, so I have to scurry back and try again. I
> wish that this feature was either in Setup or needed a 2nd
> button to make it work. Bad ergonomic design IMHO.
>
> Thanks for your help. If you have any other suggestions
> for me after reading my clarification, I'd be
> appreciative.
I wish I did, Jerry, but I think I'm at the limit of my knowledge.
Perhaps if you can get a loaner of another camera to compare, you could
consider selling the 5700. Not a very positive thing to say, but if the
design is faulty (and as your Fuji 4900 proved) then you aren't going to
get very far.
You'll know that whilst I've kept the 5700 for now, I've tried the 8400,
and if you can manage with 85mm maximum focal length that may be a
possibility (there are no easy to press compression level buttons, I know
just what you mean!). I know it's a bit late to ask now, but why did you
move from the Fuji 4900?
Cheers,
David<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: The ZLRs I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 13, 2004 Posts: 53
|
(Msg. 17) Posted: Sat Feb 05, 2005 5:16 pm
Post subject: Re: A crooked resource on the internet [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <opslqi7jvvlw3qwu.DeleteThis@jsp.ajato.com.br>, J.S.Pitanga
<jspitanga.DeleteThis@fastimap.com> wrote:
> Of course. It is the inalienable right of every idiot to display his
> idiocy for everyone to see
And you sure are doing a fine job of displaying it!!!
--
Charles<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: The ZLRs I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 02, 2004 Posts: 723
|
(Msg. 18) Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 4:42 pm
Post subject: Re: A crooked resource on the internet [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Ken" <ken.TakeThisOut@ken.ken> wrote in
news:%sXMd.897$ZZ.639@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net:
>> "J.S.Pitanga" <jspitanga.TakeThisOut@fastimap.com> wrote in message
>> news:opslo9zwn1lw3qwu@jsp.ajato.com.br...
>
> I own a Panasonic DMC FZ-20 5mp 12x zoom digital ZLR camera and
> because of that I can post to this group and talk about it as much as
> I like. I really enjoy using this type of ZLR camera. It's the best in
> its class. What type of ZLR camera do you own?
>
Personally I own a Canon G2. I also own a computer and have
a news account. And I can post in any group I wish. As long
I stay within the charter of the group I am also more than
welcome to do so.
The meaning of the acronym ZLR is within the charter of this
group with a broad margin as this group is called ZLR. The
fact that the charter for this group discribes cameras that
shall really not be called ZLR is a valid topic.
The making of this group was a mistake as it is spreading
misinformation. I understand that you that post here need
a group to discuss your somewhat more advanced compact digital
cameras. But I don't understand why you insist that your cameras
are called ZLR. They are mostly EVF and sometimes only
normal digital cameras with more zoom.
/Roland<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: The ZLRs I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 01, 2004 Posts: 1198
|
(Msg. 19) Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 4:42 pm
Post subject: Re: The ZLR group [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Roland Karlsson wrote:
[]
> The making of this group was a mistake as it is spreading
> misinformation. I understand that you that post here need
> a group to discuss your somewhat more advanced compact digital
> cameras. But I don't understand why you insist that your cameras
> are called ZLR. They are mostly EVF and sometimes only
> normal digital cameras with more zoom.
No, a majority people voted /for/ rather than /against/ this group - as a
place for discussing high-end SLR-like cameras. "ZLR" was the best name
that anyone could come up with, so now let's get on and talk about the
cameras!
Thanks,
David<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: The ZLRs I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 02, 2004 Posts: 723
|
(Msg. 20) Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 5:40 pm
Post subject: Re: The ZLR group [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"David J Taylor"
<david-taylor.RemoveThis@blueyonder.co.not-this-bit.nor-this-part.uk> wrote in
news:wPNQd.16346$8B3.15232@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk:
> No, a majority people voted /for/ rather than /against/ this group -
> as a place for discussing high-end SLR-like cameras. "ZLR" was the
> best name that anyone could come up with, so now let's get on and talk
> about the cameras!
Ye - I know the history behind it. And - of course -
you can discuss higher ended low end digital cameras
here or whatever how much you like.
But - I don't think it is OK to jump at anyone
that comes here and is surprised over the faulty
name.
You have to get over that a mistake was made and that
it will repeatedely be questioned why this group is
called ZLR. It will happen over and over again as long
as this group is active.
It is wrong - and you know it. And some here gets very edgy
when someone says so.
/Roland<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: The ZLRs I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 27, 2005 Posts: 153
|
(Msg. 21) Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:16 pm
Post subject: Re: The ZLR group [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <Xns95FFEAA4E3111klotjohan DeleteThis @130.133.1.4>,
roland_dot_karlsson DeleteThis @bonetmail.com says...
> "David J Taylor"
> <david-taylor DeleteThis @blueyonder.co.not-this-bit.nor-this-part.uk> wrote in
> news:wPNQd.16346$8B3.15232@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk:
>
> > No, a majority people voted /for/ rather than /against/ this group -
> > as a place for discussing high-end SLR-like cameras. "ZLR" was the
> > best name that anyone could come up with, so now let's get on and talk
> > about the cameras!
>
> Ye - I know the history behind it. And - of course -
> you can discuss higher ended low end digital cameras
> here or whatever how much you like.
>
> But - I don't think it is OK to jump at anyone
> that comes here and is surprised over the faulty
> name.
>
> You have to get over that a mistake was made and that
> it will repeatedely be questioned why this group is
> called ZLR. It will happen over and over again as long
> as this group is active.
>
> It is wrong - and you know it. And some here gets very edgy
> when someone says so.
>
>
>
> /Roland
>
What makes people EDGY is BEATING ON A DEAD FRIGGIN" HORSE !
--
Larry Lynch
Mystic, Ct.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: The ZLRs I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 16, 2004 Posts: 120
|
(Msg. 22) Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: The ZLR group [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Larry <larrylynch3rd.DeleteThis@comcast.net> wrote in
news:MPG.1c7d9e42b406dfe59896a7@news.individual.NET:
> In article <Xns95FFEAA4E3111klotjohan.DeleteThis@130.133.1.4>,
> roland_dot_karlsson.DeleteThis@bonetmail.com says...
>> "David J Taylor"
>> <david-taylor.DeleteThis@blueyonder.co.not-this-bit.nor-this-part.uk> wrote
>> in news:wPNQd.16346$8B3.15232@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk:
>>
>> > No, a majority people voted /for/ rather than /against/ this
>> > group - as a place for discussing high-end SLR-like cameras.
>> > "ZLR" was the best name that anyone could come up with, so now
>> > let's get on and talk about the cameras!
>>
>> Ye - I know the history behind it. And - of course -
>> you can discuss higher ended low end digital cameras
>> here or whatever how much you like.
>>
>> But - I don't think it is OK to jump at anyone
>> that comes here and is surprised over the faulty
>> name.
>>
>> You have to get over that a mistake was made and that
>> it will repeatedely be questioned why this group is
>> called ZLR. It will happen over and over again as long
>> as this group is active.
>>
>> It is wrong - and you know it. And some here gets very edgy
>> when someone says so.
>>
>>
>>
>> /Roland
>>
>
>
> What makes people EDGY is BEATING ON A DEAD FRIGGIN" HORSE !
>
>
Exactly. Roland, we have heard your opinion on this many, many, many
times. Please stop stirring up trouble. "ZLR" is not to be taken
literally, and the regs in this group accept that. Consider it a
nickname, and please leave it at that.
--
Bill<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: The ZLRs I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 02, 2004 Posts: 723
|
(Msg. 23) Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:40 pm
Post subject: Re: The ZLR group [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Woodchuck Bill <bwr607.DeleteThis@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns95FFC6A22E5A5WoodchuckBill@130.133.1.4:
> Exactly. Roland, we have heard your opinion on this many, many, many
> times. Please stop stirring up trouble. "ZLR" is not to be taken
> literally, and the regs in this group accept that. Consider it a
> nickname, and please leave it at that.
Hmmm ... maybe I was unclear. My point ws not that you should stop
posting here. You can do whatever you like of course.
My point was that you should stop and defend the name when someone
comes here and is surprised over it. And absolutely not attack the
poor guy (or doll).
My advice is that if someone says that the name is wrong, you simply
say - we know - but we don't care. Because it is wrong - and defending
the name is just going to get you inte long and fruitless threads.
If I (for some resaon) gets involved in a similar discussion in the
future I shall try to be more precise what I mean.
BTW - I think I have written 3 replies this time - all trying to
tell someone to stop bugging someone else that asks about the name.
I don't really think it is fair of you to say that I am "stirring
up trouble".
/Roland<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: The ZLRs I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 16, 2004 Posts: 120
|
(Msg. 24) Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 4:40 pm
Post subject: Re: The ZLR group [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Roland Karlsson <roland_dot_karlsson.DeleteThis@bonetmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns9600CD18C9D70klotjohan@130.133.1.4:
> BTW - I think I have written 3 replies this time - all trying to
> tell someone to stop bugging someone else that asks about the name.
> I don't really think it is fair of you to say that I am "stirring
> up trouble".
>
Fair enough. <apology>
--
Bill<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: The ZLRs I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 27, 2005 Posts: 153
|
(Msg. 25) Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 6:40 pm
Post subject: Re: The ZLR group [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <Xns9600CD18C9D70klotjohan.DeleteThis@130.133.1.4>,
roland_dot_karlsson.DeleteThis@bonetmail.com says...
> Hmmm ... maybe I was unclear. My point ws not that you should stop
> posting here. You can do whatever you like of course.
>
> My point was that you should stop and defend the name when someone
> comes here and is surprised over it. And absolutely not attack the
> poor guy (or doll).
>
> My advice is that if someone says that the name is wrong, you simply
> say - we know - but we don't care. Because it is wrong - and defending
> the name is just going to get you inte long and fruitless threads.
>
> If I (for some resaon) gets involved in a similar discussion in the
> future I shall try to be more precise what I mean.
>
>
> BTW - I think I have written 3 replies this time - all trying to
> tell someone to stop bugging someone else that asks about the name.
> I don't really think it is fair of you to say that I am "stirring
> up trouble".
>
>
> /Roland
>
>
Roland, we GET YOUR POINT..
We got it the FIRST time, and the second and the THIRD..
We UNDERSTAND you.
Your COMPLAINT is REGISTERED with the Registry of "Things Nobody Gives A Shit
About"
The group can be named "rec.photo.cameras.you.pull.out your ear" for all any
of us care.
WE know what WE come here to discuss, and USUALLY it isnt the name of the
group.
Please dont missunderstand me.. I dont dislike or disrespect you. You have
made many contributary posts to the news groups, but this CONSTANT "pissing
and Moaning" about the name of this group is getting REALLY tedious.
The name of the group dosen't decide what gets discussed here, THE CHARTER
DOES.
--
Larry Lynch
Mystic, Ct.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: The ZLRs I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 06, 2004 Posts: 14
|
(Msg. 26) Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:40 am
Post subject: Re: The ZLR group [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Larry" <larrylynch3rd.RemoveThis@comcast.net> wrote in message > > My advice is that
if someone > >
> Roland, we GET YOUR POINT..
>
> We got it the FIRST time, and the second and the THIRD..
>
> We UNDERSTAND you.
>
> Your COMPLAINT is REGISTERED with the Registry of "Things Nobody Gives A
Shit
> About"
>
> The group can be named "rec.photo.cameras.you.pull.out your ear" for all
any
> of us care.
>
> WE know what WE come here to discuss, and USUALLY it isnt the name of the
> group.
>
> Please dont missunderstand me.. I dont dislike or disrespect you. You have
> made many contributary posts to the news groups, but this CONSTANT
"pissing
> and Moaning" about the name of this group is getting REALLY tedious.
>
> The name of the group dosen't decide what gets discussed here, THE CHARTER
> DOES.
> --
> Larry Lynch
> Mystic, Ct.
Well said Larry. Would be really nice to see cameras and camera things
getting discussed here. Unfortunatelly I've just returned my Nikon CP8800 so
I guess I don't qualify any longer :~((
Leo<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: The ZLRs I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 10, 2004 Posts: 106
|
(Msg. 27) Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:40 am
Post subject: Re: The ZLR group [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Leo R. commented courteously ...
[snip]
> Unfortunatelly I've just returned my Nikon CP8800...
so I guess I don't qualify
[snip]
What happened, Leo? Anything I should know about? I'm
getting ready to go buy an 8800 and the SB-800 early next
week, now that the big camera show is over and nothing
came out to replace it.
I assume its you problem with high shutter speeds ? ...
Thanks.
--
ATM, aka Jerry<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: The ZLRs I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 06, 2004 Posts: 14
|
(Msg. 28) Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 4:40 am
Post subject: Re: The ZLR group [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"All Things Mopar" <usenetMAPS123 DeleteThis @comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9600ED161254BReplyToken@216.196.97.131...
> Leo R. commented courteously ...
>
> [snip]
> > Unfortunatelly I've just returned my Nikon CP8800...
> so I guess I don't qualify
> [snip]
>
> What happened, Leo? Anything I should know about? I'm
> getting ready to go buy an 8800 and the SB-800 early next
> week, now that the big camera show is over and nothing
> came out to replace it.
>
> I assume its you problem with high shutter speeds ? ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> ATM, aka Jerry
Hi again Jerry,
Yes the high shutter speed problem is it. I would miss out on too much of
the challenging type of photography I enjoy. The camera specs provide for it
to take a properly exposed photo at high speeds but it simply won't do it.
It appears to be a problem common to all CP8800s so although Nikon wouldn't
admit to that, they did take the camera back rather than replace it. It
wasn't an easy decision for me, because apart from that it is a fabulous
camera. IMHO none of the other 8Mp digicams come close to the 8800 so I'm
looking at a D70. BTW the audio is out of sync with the video too but I
knew that before I bought it.
Unless you wish to capture pics at very high shutter speeds I'm sure you'll
enjoy the 8800.
Regards.
Leo<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: The ZLRs I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 02, 2004 Posts: 723
|
(Msg. 29) Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 6:49 pm
Post subject: Re: The ZLR group [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Larry <larrylynch3rd DeleteThis @comcast.net> wrote in news:MPG.1c7ee8d43313d8659896b2
@news.individual.NET:
> Roland, we GET YOUR POINT..
>
> We got it the FIRST time, and the second and the THIRD..
Why so hostile?
Please calm down and behave.
/Roland<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: The ZLRs I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 19, 2005 Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 30) Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 8:42 pm
Post subject: Re: A crooked resource on the internet [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Roland Karlsson schreef:
> "Ken" <ken RemoveThis @ken.ken> wrote in
> news:%sXMd.897$ZZ.639@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net:
>
>
>>>"J.S.Pitanga" <jspitanga RemoveThis @fastimap.com> wrote in message
>>>news:opslo9zwn1lw3qwu@jsp.ajato.com.br...
>>
>>I own a Panasonic DMC FZ-20 5mp 12x zoom digital ZLR camera and
>>because of that I can post to this group and talk about it as much as
>>I like. I really enjoy using this type of ZLR camera. It's the best in
>>its class. What type of ZLR camera do you own?
>>
>
>
> Personally I own a Canon G2. I also own a computer and have
> a news account. And I can post in any group I wish. As long
> I stay within the charter of the group I am also more than
> welcome to do so.
>
> The meaning of the acronym ZLR is within the charter of this
> group with a broad margin as this group is called ZLR. The
> fact that the charter for this group discribes cameras that
> shall really not be called ZLR is a valid topic.
>
> The making of this group was a mistake as it is spreading
> misinformation. I understand that you that post here need
> a group to discuss your somewhat more advanced compact digital
> cameras. But I don't understand why you insist that your cameras
> are called ZLR. They are mostly EVF and sometimes only
> normal digital cameras with more zoom.
>
>
> /Roland
I'm thinking about the KM A200.
Not shure yet
I like the 28-200 mm (not so many do have such a lens)
Rather nice video (for a photo camera !)
8 megapixels
RAW
Not too heavy camera an rather small
Manual zoom
But I've been made a little bit afraid af all the postings on the
several FORUM about "dull" images.
Anyone can help me out ??<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: The ZLRs I own |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|