Bill Tuthill wrote:
> Tomoko Yamamoto <email.DeleteThis@tomoko-yamamoto.com> wrote:
>
>>I tried your formula using Photoshop. I think it comes close except for
>>the hat. I could also get a close match using a combination of green
>>and yellow, but the hat was a problem.
>
>
> You are right, the hat fabric it too green under my formula, and the
> yellow flower is oversaturated. This is why reciprocity is called
> "failure" -- because it messes up color balance.
>
>
>>Where can one get a Macbeth chart? By the way I have once shot the
>>background only inside and in sunlight. In sunlight the background
>>looks less green on Velvia 100F.
>
>
> You're saying that Velvia 100F emphasizes greens more indoors than
> in sunlight? Maybe it was the fluorescent lighting, which is usually
> greenish. You can buy a Macbeth color checker for under $70 at any of
> the NYC retailers. The B&H website has a picture of one.
The difference is very small, but if I look at the transparencies under
a loupe, there is a subtle difference. The indoor shots show more cyan
than the outdoor shots.
By the way I realized that I had seen Macbeth chart tests on six films
(three new Fuji films including Velvia 100 and three Kodak films) in a
Japanese photo magazine. Compared to the picture on the B&H website,
the magazine article shows mostly overexposed charts. I don't know
whether this was due to printing or what, but the black on the chart is
not coming out black on the Fuji films, but is more black on the Kodak
films. Yet the picture captions say that the black hair of a woman
model, who is holding the Macbeth chart, is not good on the Kodak films
compared to the Fuji films.
Tomoko Yamamoto
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.tomoko-yamamoto.com/" target="_blank">http://www.tomoko-yamamoto.com/</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Velvia 100F: Reciprocity Failure