Top 5 Point and Shoots under $500

<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.google.com/" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/</a>

"measekite" <measekite RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cXeUd.9811$Pz7.328@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
 > What are the top 5 point and shoot camera for under $500
 >
 >
 > in the EVR non compact class
 >
 >
 >
 > in the compact class
 >
 >
 >
 > and in the sub compact class
 >
 >
 >
 > AND WHY?<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Top 5 Point and Shoots under $500 

Bugger off, not telling!

"measekite" <measekite.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cXeUd.9811$Pz7.328@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
 > What are the top 5 point and shoot camera for under $500
 >
 >
 > in the EVR non compact class
 >
 >
 >
 > in the compact class
 >
 >
 >
 > and in the sub compact class
 >
 >
 >
 > AND WHY?<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Top 5 Point and Shoots under $500 

OK ASSHOLE!

Pete D wrote:

 >Bugger off, not telling!
 >
 >"measekite" <measekite.RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
 >news:cXeUd.9811$Pz7.328@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
 >
 >
  >>What are the top 5 point and shoot camera for under $500
  >>
  >>
  >>in the EVR non compact class
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >>in the compact class
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >>and in the sub compact class
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >>AND WHY?
  >>
  >>
 >
 >
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Top 5 Point and Shoots under $500 

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:49:31 GMT, measekite <measekite.DeleteThis@yahoo.com>
wrote:

 >OK ASSHOLE!

You gotta admit you didn't give much in the way of what you wanted.
You can very easily buy a few mags and get their lists, or go online
to their sites.
But you gave no inkling of what you considered to be important, what
criteria you wanted us to use in making any choices. Cost, zoom range,
lack of noise, movie capability, and on and on.
What do you want?
 >
 >Pete D wrote:
 >
  >>Bugger off, not telling!
  >>
  >>"measekite" <measekite.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
  >>news:cXeUd.9811$Pz7.328@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
  >>
  >>
   >>>What are the top 5 point and shoot camera for under $500
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>in the EVR non compact class
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>in the compact class
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>and in the sub compact class
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>AND WHY?
   >>>
   >>>
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >>

--
Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Top 5 Point and Shoots under $500 

I want people's personal opinions on what they think is best regardless
of criteria. For example in the printer area Lexmark Printers are shit
irrespective of criteria while Canon, Epson, and HP are good. Now i
think that Canon is the best of the bunch; especially the IP4000.

Now based on a persons criteria, the 2nd or 3rd best might be better for
them. I just want other's opinions in each class.

Big Bill wrote:

 >On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:49:31 GMT, measekite <measekite DeleteThis @yahoo.com>
 >wrote:
 >
 >
 >
  >>OK ASSHOLE!
  >>
  >>
 >
 >You gotta admit you didn't give much in the way of what you wanted.
 >You can very easily buy a few mags and get their lists, or go online
 >to their sites.
 >But you gave no inkling of what you considered to be important, what
 >criteria you wanted us to use in making any choices. Cost, zoom range,
 >lack of noise, movie capability, and on and on.
 >What do you want?
 >
 >
  >>Pete D wrote:
  >>
  >>
  >>
   >>>Bugger off, not telling!
   >>>
   >>>"measekite" <measekite DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote in message
   >>>news:cXeUd.9811$Pz7.328@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>>What are the top 5 point and shoot camera for under $500
   >>>>
   >>>>
   >>>>in the EVR non compact class
   >>>>
   >>>>
   >>>>
   >>>>in the compact class
   >>>>
   >>>>
   >>>>
   >>>>and in the sub compact class
   >>>>
   >>>>
   >>>>
   >>>>AND WHY?
   >>>>
   >>>>
   >>>>
   >>>>
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>
 >
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Top 5 Point and Shoots under $500 

On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:04:35 GMT, measekite <measekite.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com>
wrote:

 >I want people's personal opinions on what they think is best regardless
 >of criteria. For example in the printer area Lexmark Printers are shit
 >irrespective of criteria while Canon, Epson, and HP are good. Now i
 >think that Canon is the best of the bunch; especially the IP4000.
 >
 >Now based on a persons criteria, the 2nd or 3rd best might be better for
 >them. I just want other's opinions in each class.

Then pick any five. They will be the top five in somebody's list.
Now pick another five. They will be the top five in somebody's list.
Continue this exersize until you've ranked all models in all orders.
Presto! You've got your lists.

If this isn't what you really want, then you've really got to define
your wants better.

When you give your Lexmark example, you strongly indicate that "shit"
models (your term) won't be on anyone's top five list, yet they
continue to sell product. There's a conflict there.
What are you really trying to do but if not troll?

--
Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Top 5 Point and Shoots under $500 

1. You will always get personal opinions here.

2. You must do some research yourself and give some idea of what you like so
that the nice people here can work out what you are really after.

3. Be nice, calling someone an asrehole because they used a flippant remark
after you demanded that people did things NOW is not the best way.

4. Chill. We are your friends if you want but will blow you off pretty quick
if you are total dick.

"measekite" <measekite.RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ngAUd.10007$Pz7.770@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
 >I want people's personal opinions on what they think is best regardless of
 >criteria. For example in the printer area Lexmark Printers are shit
 >irrespective of criteria while Canon, Epson, and HP are good. Now i think
 >that Canon is the best of the bunch; especially the IP4000.
 >
 > Now based on a persons criteria, the 2nd or 3rd best might be better for
 > them. I just want other's opinions in each class.
 >
 > Big Bill wrote:
 >
  >>On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:49:31 GMT, measekite <measekite.RemoveThis@yahoo.com>
  >>wrote:
  >>
  >>
   >>>OK ASSHOLE!
   >>>
  >>
  >>You gotta admit you didn't give much in the way of what you wanted.
  >>You can very easily buy a few mags and get their lists, or go online
  >>to their sites.
  >>But you gave no inkling of what you considered to be important, what
  >>criteria you wanted us to use in making any choices. Cost, zoom range,
  >>lack of noise, movie capability, and on and on.
  >>What do you want?
  >>
   >>>Pete D wrote:
   >>>
   >>>
   >>>>Bugger off, not telling!
   >>>>
   >>>>"measekite" <measekite.RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
   >>>>news:cXeUd.9811$Pz7.328@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
   >>>>
   >>>>
   >>>>>What are the top 5 point and shoot camera for under $500
   >>>>>
   >>>>>
   >>>>>in the EVR non compact class
   >>>>>
   >>>>>
   >>>>>
   >>>>>in the compact class
   >>>>>
   >>>>>
   >>>>>
   >>>>>and in the sub compact class
   >>>>>
   >>>>>
   >>>>>
   >>>>>AND WHY?
   >>>>>
   >>>>
   >>>>
  >>
  >><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Top 5 Point and Shoots under $500 

 > Then pick any five. They will be the top five in somebody's list.
 > Now pick another five. They will be the top five in somebody's list.
 > Continue this exersize until you've ranked all models in all orders.
 > Presto! You've got your lists.
 >
 > If this isn't what you really want, then you've really got to define
 > your wants better.
 >
 > When you give your Lexmark example, you strongly indicate that "shit"
 > models (your term) won't be on anyone's top five list, yet they
 > continue to sell product. There's a conflict there.
 > What are you really trying to do but if not troll?

Yes indeed and I am the arsehole???<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Top 5 Point and Shoots under $500