Snapfish

External Since: Jun 29, 2003 Posts: 11

After years of using Kodak and occasional other processors, I tried Snapfish
for APS. Turnaround time was good, price was OK, the posting of the whole
roll the day they got it on the web was excellent,
BUT-----

NO DATA ON THE BACK OF THE PRINTS. NOT A PRINT NUMBER, NOT A DATE, NO IX
INFORMATION.

THEY USED THE INFORMATION BECAUSE THE PRINTS WERE THE APPROPRIATE FORMATS
(4X6, 4X7 AND P) BUT NOTHING ON THE BACK. THE INDEX PRINT HAD THE START AND
STOP DATES, SO THEY DID READ THE THING, JUST DIDN'T PRINT IT.

Is this their usual practice?

--
Michael Weinstein | "Never underestimate the power of stupid
Nashua, NH | people in large groups."

External Since: Jun 12, 2004 Posts: 76

I use Snapfish routinely for APS and 135 film. I always get back
printing on APS. The one time I got a bad set of prints they reprinted them
for me. I suggest asking for another set of prints with the proper
backprinting.

--
Ron Andrews
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://members.hostedscripts.com/antispam.html" target="_blank">http://members.hostedscripts.com/antispam.html</a>
"Michael Weinstein, M.D." <drmike99 RemoveThis @ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:BC09395F.1C41D%drmike99@ix.netcom.com...
> After years of using Kodak and occasional other processors, I tried
Snapfish
> for APS. Turnaround time was good, price was OK, the posting of the whole
> roll the day they got it on the web was excellent,
> BUT-----
>
> NO DATA ON THE BACK OF THE PRINTS. NOT A PRINT NUMBER, NOT A DATE, NO IX
> INFORMATION.
>
> THEY USED THE INFORMATION BECAUSE THE PRINTS WERE THE APPROPRIATE FORMATS
> (4X6, 4X7 AND P) BUT NOTHING ON THE BACK. THE INDEX PRINT HAD THE START
AND
> STOP DATES, SO THEY DID READ THE THING, JUST DIDN'T PRINT IT.
>
> Is this their usual practice?
>
>
> --
> Michael Weinstein | "Never underestimate the power of stupid
> Nashua, NH | people in large groups."
>