In article <bogim1$1dflae$1@ID-205866.news.uni-berlin.de>,
jetcode.nospamthankyou.RemoveThis@allvantage.com says...
> Nice presentation Robert ... good informative reading ... it would be
> interesting to have similar tests performed on large format images. I'm off
> to checkout the rest of your images ...
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> "Robert Feinman" <robertdfeinman.RemoveThis@netscape.net> wrote in message
> news:1068156181.937156@nntp.acecape.com...
> > For you (semi-)ditigial photographers, I've added a discussion about the
> > differeneces between 16 bit and 8 bit image capture (scanning) and
> subsequent
> > editing to my web site.
> >
> > Follow the tips link on the home page.
> >
> > --
> > Robert D Feinman
> > robertdfeinman.RemoveThis@netscape.net
<font color=green> > > Landscapes, Cityscapes, Panoramic Photographs: <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://robertdfeinman.com</font" target="_blank">http://robertdfeinman.com</font</a>>
> >
>
>
>
I don't see why the format of the original has any bearing. The only
effect from a larger original is that you probably won't enlarge as
much, which means that the single pixel changes that predominate between
the two will be even less visible.
If, and when the new epson 4800 dpi, 16 bit scanner becomes available
the subject can be approached again.
I didn't state any conclusions in my discussion, but it seems to me that
16 bit capture and large scale dynamic range change are a good idea.
For subsequent adjustments and output differences are minimal.
--
Robert D Feinman
robertdfeinman.RemoveThis@netscape.net
Landscapes, Cityscapes, Panoramas and Photoshop Tips
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://robertdfeinman.com" target="_blank">http://robertdfeinman.com</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Slightly OT: New tip about 16 bit processing 
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
