Welcome to PhotoForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

SD Card May Replace Compact Flash????

  
Goto page Previous  1, 2
   Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> General RSS
Next:  Bower flashes  
Author Message
John Navas

External


Since: Nov 04, 2007
Posts: 1436



(Msg. 16) Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 4:34 pm
Post subject: Re: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)
On 19 Feb 2008 15:48:28 GMT, Bert Hyman <bert.DeleteThis@iphouse.com> wrote in
<Xns9A4963C5E62CBVeebleFetzer.DeleteThis@127.0.0.1>:

>inkystinky@oem.com (measekite) wrote in
>news:ySBuj.8304$5K1.3414@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net:
>
>><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
>><html>
>><head>
>> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"
>> http-equiv="Content-Type">
>></head>
>><body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
>><br>
>><br>
>
>What?

Best just to ignore or filter him out.
"Don't feed the trolls."

--
Best regards,
John Navas
Panasonic DMC-FZ8 (and several others)

 >> Stay informed about: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? 
Back to top
Login to vote
John Navas

External


Since: Nov 04, 2007
Posts: 1436



(Msg. 17) Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 4:36 pm
Post subject: Re: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:57:55 -0800, Gary Edstrom <GEdstrom.DeleteThis@PacBell.Net>
wrote in <5rulr3lh07t16kkc8vhfo3jifq7vf376im.DeleteThis@4ax.com>:

>I think you will get along a lot better if you disable HTML posting in
>your Usenet client. HTML posting can bring a LOT of flames in certain
>news groups. I don't know what Micro$oft was thinking when they
>introduced HTML to Usenet! It was one of the biggest disasters around.
>Usenet began as a text-only system, and many would like to keep it that
>way.

Microsoft was being Microsoft, ignoring standards, throwing its weight
around because it can, and trying to force everyone to adopt Microsoft
software.

--
Best regards,
John Navas
Panasonic DMC-FZ8 (and several others)

 >> Stay informed about: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jürgen Exner

External


Since: Dec 18, 2007
Posts: 182



(Msg. 18) Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:33 pm
Post subject: Re: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Bert Hyman <bert DeleteThis @iphouse.com> wrote:
>In news:BjHtj.1911$fX7.717@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com measekite
><inkystinky DeleteThis @oem.com> wrote:
>
>><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
>><html>
>><head>
>></head>
>><body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
>
>What?

Don't even bother. Just plonk him like everybody else did.

jue
 >> Stay informed about: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? 
Back to top
Login to vote
measekite

External


Since: Aug 16, 2006
Posts: 125



(Msg. 19) Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:25 pm
Post subject: Re: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
Bert Hyman wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:Xns9A4963C5E62CBVeebleFetzer@127.0.0.1"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:inkystinky@oem.com">inkystinky@oem.com</a> (measekite) wrote in
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:ySBuj.8304$5K1.3414@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net:">news:ySBuj.8304$5K1.3414@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net:</a>

</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
What?
</pre>
</blockquote>
You need a modern news reader.<br>
</body>
</html>
 >> Stay informed about: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? 
Back to top
Login to vote
measekite

External


Since: Aug 16, 2006
Posts: 125



(Msg. 20) Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:27 pm
Post subject: Re: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
Gary Edstrom wrote:
> I think you will get along a lot better if you disable HTML posting in
> your Usenet client. HTML posting can bring a LOT of flames in certain
> news groups. I don't know what Micro$oft was thinking when they
> introduced HTML to Usenet!
They wanted users to use more advanced software and take advantages of
the modern conveniences. Some died in the wool propellerheads refuse to
budge. It certainly is better to see
>

>>>
>>
>> prefacing different replies.
> It was one of the biggest disasters around.
> Usenet began as a text-only system, and many would like to keep it that
> way.
>
> Gary
>
 >> Stay informed about: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Bert Hyman

External


Since: Mar 19, 2005
Posts: 70



(Msg. 21) Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:27 pm
Post subject: Re: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
inkystinky.RemoveThis@oem.com (measekite) wrote in news:ZnZuj.9920$0o7.9849
@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net:

> <html>
> <head>
> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"
> http-equiv="Content-Type">
> </head>
> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
> <br>
> <br>

What?

--
Bert Hyman | St. Paul, MN | bert.RemoveThis@iphouse.com
 >> Stay informed about: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? 
Back to top
Login to vote
measekite

External


Since: Aug 16, 2006
Posts: 125



(Msg. 22) Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:28 pm
Post subject: Re: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
John Navas wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:ks0mr35hb0njl2hkdqakecoocajaheas3h@4ax.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:21:28 -0600, John Turco <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jtur@concentric.net"><jtur.DeleteThis@concentric.net></a>
wrote in <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:47BAADA8.207862E6@concentric.net"><47BAADA8.207862E6.DeleteThis@concentric.net></a>:

</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Bert Hyman wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">In <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:w1QxjvJyA1tHFwbc@spam.newbrain.demon.co.uk">news:w1QxjvJyA1tHFwbc@spam.newbrain.demon.co.uk</a> Prometheus
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Prometheus@127.0.0.1"><Prometheus.DeleteThis@127.0.0.1></a> wrote:

</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">In article <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Xns9A46941571B58VeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7"><Xns9A46941571B58VeebleFetzer.DeleteThis@216.250.184.7></a>, Bert Hyman
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:bert@iphouse.com"><bert.DeleteThis@iphouse.com></a> writes
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">In <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:BjHtj.1911$fX7.717@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com">news:BjHtj.1911$fX7.717@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com</a> measekite
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:inkystinky@oem.com"><inkystinky.DeleteThis@oem.com></a> wrote:

</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">What?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Looks like your newsreader is broken,
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">No.

Looks like the OP's posting software is seriously screwed up.

HTML has no place in USENET; my server at work is configured to reject
any HTML content.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I concur, as such HTML junk appears in my own news reader (Netscape
Communicator 4.Cool, also. It may be an old application (circa 2003),
and Netscape (the company) is definitely defunct, but, that hardly
excuses "measekite's" inconsiderate behavior.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Look at the clutter of your news reader with >  >>> >
>>> > before many lines<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:ks0mr35hb0njl2hkdqakecoocajaheas3h@4ax.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><!---->
My principal newsreader is Forte Agent 1.93, which IMHO had never been
equaled, much less beat, by other newsreaders, including later bloated
versions of Forte Agent. Designed as a pure Usenet newsreader to Usenet
standards, it can only handle plain text directly.

HTML posting, like much other Microsoft conduct, is contrary to Usenet
standards, rude, and wasteful of Usenet resources.

After asking nicely a couple of times, I add anyone rude enough to
persist in HTML posting to my twit filter, which is of course no great
loss.

</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
 >> Stay informed about: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? 
Back to top
Login to vote
measekite

External


Since: Aug 16, 2006
Posts: 125



(Msg. 23) Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:29 pm
Post subject: Re: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
John Navas wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:s91mr3d3kmdktj5ngurqoi5igjqajt3523@4ax.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:57:55 -0800, Gary Edstrom <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:GEdstrom@PacBell.Net"><GEdstrom.DeleteThis@PacBell.Net></a>
wrote in <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:5rulr3lh07t16kkc8vhfo3jifq7vf376im@4ax.com"><5rulr3lh07t16kkc8vhfo3jifq7vf376im.DeleteThis@4ax.com></a>:

</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I think you will get along a lot better if you disable HTML posting in
your Usenet client. HTML posting can bring a LOT of flames in certain
news groups. I don't know what Micro$oft was thinking when they
introduced HTML to Usenet! It was one of the biggest disasters around.
Usenet began as a text-only system, and many would like to keep it that
way.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Microsoft was being Microsoft, ignoring standards, throwing its weight
around because it can, and trying to force everyone to adopt Microsoft
software.
</pre>
</blockquote>
I am not using Microsoft software but they are not incorrect all of the
time.<br>
</body>
</html>
 >> Stay informed about: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? 
Back to top
Login to vote
measekite

External


Since: Aug 16, 2006
Posts: 125



(Msg. 24) Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:27 am
Post subject: Re: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
measekite wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:HqZuj.9922$0o7.5877@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
<br>
John Navas wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:ks0mr35hb0njl2hkdqakecoocajaheas3h@4ax.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:21:28 -0600, John Turco <a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:jtur@concentric.net"><jtur.RemoveThis@concentric.net></a>
wrote in <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:47BAADA8.207862E6@concentric.net"><47BAADA8.207862E6.RemoveThis@concentric.net></a>:

</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Bert Hyman wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">In <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="news:w1QxjvJyA1tHFwbc@spam.newbrain.demon.co.uk">news:w1QxjvJyA1tHFwbc@spam.newbrain.demon.co.uk</a> Prometheus
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:Prometheus@127.0.0.1"><Prometheus.RemoveThis@127.0.0.1></a> wrote:

</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">In article <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:Xns9A46941571B58VeebleFetzer@216.250.184.7"><Xns9A46941571B58VeebleFetzer.RemoveThis@216.250.184.7></a>, Bert Hyman
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:bert@iphouse.com"><bert.RemoveThis@iphouse.com></a> writes
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">In <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="news:BjHtj.1911$fX7.717@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com">news:BjHtj.1911$fX7.717@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com</a> measekite
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:inkystinky@oem.com"><inkystinky.RemoveThis@oem.com></a> wrote:

</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">What?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Looks like your newsreader is broken,
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">No.

Looks like the OP's posting software is seriously screwed up.

HTML has no place in USENET; my server at work is configured to reject
any HTML content.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I concur, as such HTML junk appears in my own news reader (Netscape
Communicator 4.Cool, also. It may be an old application (circa 2003),
and Netscape (the company) is definitely defunct, but, that hardly
excuses "measekite's" inconsiderate behavior.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Look at the clutter of your news reader with >  >>> >
>>> > before many lines<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:ks0mr35hb0njl2hkdqakecoocajaheas3h@4ax.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><!---->
My principal newsreader is Forte Agent 1.93, which IMHO had never been
equaled, much less beat, by other newsreaders, including later bloated
versions of Forte Agent. Designed as a pure Usenet newsreader to Usenet
standards, it can only handle plain text directly.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
It has outlived its usefullness.  It is for earlier computing
generations.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:HqZuj.9922$0o7.5877@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net"
type="cite">
<blockquote cite="mid:ks0mr35hb0njl2hkdqakecoocajaheas3h@4ax.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
HTML posting, like much other Microsoft conduct, is contrary to Usenet
standards, rude, and wasteful of Usenet resources.

After asking nicely a couple of times, I add anyone rude enough to
persist in HTML posting to my twit filter, which is of course no great
loss.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Maybe they should ad you to a twit filter.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:HqZuj.9922$0o7.5877@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net"
type="cite">
<blockquote cite="mid:ks0mr35hb0njl2hkdqakecoocajaheas3h@4ax.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
 >> Stay informed about: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? 
Back to top
Login to vote
John Turco

External


Since: Aug 02, 2006
Posts: 836



(Msg. 25) Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:47 am
Post subject: Re: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
John Navas wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:21:28 -0600, John Turco <jtur.TakeThisOut@concentric.net>
> wrote in <47BAADA8.207862E6.TakeThisOut@concentric.net>:
>
> >Bert Hyman wrote:

<edited for brevity>

> >> HTML has no place in USENET; my server at work is configured to reject
> >> any HTML content.
>
> >I concur, as such HTML junk appears in my own news reader (Netscape
> >Communicator 4.Cool, also. It may be an old application (circa 2003),
> >and Netscape (the company) is definitely defunct, but, that hardly
> >excuses "measekite's" inconsiderate behavior.
>
> My principal newsreader is Forte Agent 1.93, which IMHO had never been
> equaled, much less beat, by other newsreaders, including later bloated
> versions of Forte Agent. Designed as a pure Usenet newsreader to Usenet
> standards, it can only handle plain text directly.
>
> HTML posting, like much other Microsoft conduct, is contrary to Usenet
> standards, rude, and wasteful of Usenet resources.
>
> After asking nicely a couple of times, I add anyone rude enough to
> persist in HTML posting to my twit filter, which is of course no great
> loss.


Hello, John:

Despite its age and orphaning, I prefer Communicator as my primary news reader
and e-mail program, due to certain of its key features.

Although, I've been unable to send any e-mail messages, from it, for roughly
the past year and a half (Usenet posts work fine, on the other hand). Thus,
I'm forced to employ the detestable Outlook Express. (I've often suspected this
issue was caused by some type of change, made by my dial-up ISP, Concentric.)

Now, as a Web browser, Communicator is totally obsolete; I've long used Internet
Explorer, for that task.


Cordially,
John Turco <jtur.TakeThisOut@concentric.net>
 >> Stay informed about: SD Card May Replace Compact Flash???? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> General All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
 You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]