|
Related Topics:
| WTB: 2d rear extension & other discussion - The 2D is in nice shape. I got the Ilex 12" mounted last night and will try to shoot some this Sat. My other lenses are an old Fujinon-W 210/5.6, so I'll build a board for that lens, and a 360 APO Nikkor. The problem is my 360 APO Nikkor. Since I
Scratch in rear lens cell!! How can it be reduced or remov.. - Scratch in rear lens cell!! How can it be reduced or removed? I have a scratch in the center outer glass of the rear lens cell on a rather rare lens and am curious as to option for removal via polishing or reduction by same method. The lens --N...
?? re: front tilt on field camera - I have been using a Tachihara 4x5 field camera for the last four or five years and really like it. However if there is one thing I would change on the camera it would be to add axis tilt on the front. That would make the plane of focus..
Towering Rockface Tilt Problem - Twice yesterday I found myself in front of hundred foot rockfaces that seemed to prefer that I did not tilt. That is, from the base where much important detail was, to the top of the rockface, where I had to maintain focus to unify the I found..
Anyone have experience using 35mm tilt & shift ? - Please forgive me for asking this question in lg. format NG. But I'm hoping that you folks might know more about this, than the people at smaller format NGs. I've been invited to be to in an project. The goal is My..
|
|
|
Next: CMOS image aging
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Feb 24, 2004
Posts: 287
|
(Msg. 16) Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 1:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Rear tilt focus? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>photo>equipment>large-format (more info?)
|
|
|
"Bob Salomon" <bob_salomon DeleteThis @mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:bob_salomon-4BE1D8.07380114042005@news.isp.giganews.com...
> In article <hJt7e.4358697$Zm5.686095@news.easynews.com>,
> "Matt Clara" <no.emailz DeleteThis @this.guys.expense> wrote:
>
> > back swings and tilts will fundamentally effect
> > composition of the subject on the film plane,
>
> No. They will change image shape but the rock will still be in the same
> place on the ground glass.
>
> --
> To reply no_ HPMarketing Corp.
That's still a change in composition--the image you were composing now looks
different than it did.
--
Regards,
Matt Clara
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.mattclara.com" target="_blank">www.mattclara.com</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Feb 24, 2004
Posts: 287
|
(Msg. 17) Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 1:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Rear tilt focus? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Fred Leif" <fsleif RemoveThis @starband.net> wrote in message
news:24585$425ea98d$94403028$16795@STARBAND.NET...
> Actually, I wasn't 'recommending' anything. Just providing quotes from a
> nice vintage book that I thought would help the original poster.
>
Nor did I mean to put words in your mouth, which is why I said "seems
like"...
--
Regards,
Matt Clara
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.mattclara.com" target="_blank">www.mattclara.com</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 655
|
(Msg. 18) Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 6:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Rear tilt focus? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Matt Clara" <no.emailz.RemoveThis@this.guys.expense> wrote in message
news:ndS7e.12239$za2.1289@news.easynews.com...
> "Bob Salomon" <bob_salomon.RemoveThis@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> news:bob_salomon-4BE1D8.07380114042005@news.isp.giganews.com...
>> In article <hJt7e.4358697$Zm5.686095@news.easynews.com>,
>> "Matt Clara" <no.emailz.RemoveThis@this.guys.expense> wrote:
>>
>> > back swings and tilts will fundamentally effect
>> > composition of the subject on the film plane,
>>
>> No. They will change image shape but the rock will still be in the same
>> place on the ground glass.
>>
>> --
>> To reply no_ HPMarketing Corp.
>
Sorry, I see you're actually giving me a hard time about my loose use of the
word "subject". No, the subject won't actually be on the film plane as one
might infer from my text. I should have said, "back swings and tilts will
fundamentally effect composition of the image of the subject projected on
the film plane." I could have left off the word "plane," too, but chose to
leave it because it's the film's plane that is changed with swings and tilts
of the rear standard.
--
Regards,
Matt Clara
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.mattclara.com" target="_blank">www.mattclara.com</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Rear tilt focus? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 23, 2004
Posts: 1182
|
(Msg. 19) Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Rear tilt focus? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Matt Clara" <critics.DeleteThis@large.com> wrote in message
news:rAA8e.225934$za2.37020@news.easynews.com...
> "Matt Clara" <no.emailz.DeleteThis@this.guys.expense> wrote in message
> news:ndS7e.12239$za2.1289@news.easynews.com...
> > "Bob Salomon" <bob_salomon.DeleteThis@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> > news:bob_salomon-4BE1D8.07380114042005@news.isp.giganews.com...
> >> In article <hJt7e.4358697$Zm5.686095@news.easynews.com>,
> >> "Matt Clara" <no.emailz.DeleteThis@this.guys.expense> wrote:
> >>
> >> > back swings and tilts will fundamentally effect
> >> > composition of the subject on the film plane,
> >>
> >> No. They will change image shape but the rock will still be in the
> >> same place on the ground glass.
> >>
> >> --
> >> To reply no_ HPMarketing Corp.
> >
>
> Sorry, I see you're actually giving me a hard time about my loose use >
of the word "subject". No, the subject won't actually be on the film
> plane as one might infer from my text. I should have said, "back
> swings and tilts will fundamentally effect composition of the image of
> the subject projected on the film plane." I could have left off the
> word "plane," too, but chose to leave it because it's the film's plane
> that is changed with swings and tilts of the rear standard.
>
>
Well, if we're going to get into matters of precise language, you mean
"affect", not "effect" in the above...
Peter<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Rear tilt focus? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 25, 2005
Posts: 45
|
(Msg. 20) Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Rear tilt focus? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Bandicoot" <"insert_handle_here"@techemail.com> wrote in message
news:1113848026.12239.0@lotis.uk.clara.net...
> Well, if we're going to get into matters of precise language, you mean
> "affect", not "effect" in the above...
Please do not end sentences with ellipses...<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Rear tilt focus? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 23, 2004
Posts: 1182
|
(Msg. 21) Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2005 8:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Rear tilt focus? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"jjs" <jjs RemoveThis @jjs.jjs> wrote in message
news:1167ucbtcnrfme7@news.supernews.com...
> "Bandicoot" <"insert_handle_here"@techemail.com> wrote in message
> news:1113848026.12239.0@lotis.uk.clara.net...
>
> > Well, if we're going to get into matters of precise language, you mean
> > "affect", not "effect" in the above...
>
> Please do not end sentences with ellipses...
>
>
I like ellipses, they sort of mirror the way I talk, fading off into an
incoherent - but highly suggestive - murmur...
I like dashes too. So did Edgar Alan Poe - he scattered them all over the
place.
Peter<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Rear tilt focus? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 655
|
(Msg. 22) Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 8:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Rear tilt focus? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Bandicoot" <"insert_handle_here"@techemail.com> wrote in message
news:1113848026.12239.0@lotis.uk.clara.net...
> "Matt Clara" <critics.TakeThisOut@large.com> wrote in message
> news:rAA8e.225934$za2.37020@news.easynews.com...
>> "Matt Clara" <no.emailz.TakeThisOut@this.guys.expense> wrote in message
>> news:ndS7e.12239$za2.1289@news.easynews.com...
>> > "Bob Salomon" <bob_salomon.TakeThisOut@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>> > news:bob_salomon-4BE1D8.07380114042005@news.isp.giganews.com...
>> >> In article <hJt7e.4358697$Zm5.686095@news.easynews.com>,
>> >> "Matt Clara" <no.emailz.TakeThisOut@this.guys.expense> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > back swings and tilts will fundamentally effect
>> >> > composition of the subject on the film plane,
>> >>
>> >> No. They will change image shape but the rock will still be in the
>> >> same place on the ground glass.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> To reply no_ HPMarketing Corp.
>> >
>>
>> Sorry, I see you're actually giving me a hard time about my loose use >
> of the word "subject". No, the subject won't actually be on the film
>> plane as one might infer from my text. I should have said, "back
>> swings and tilts will fundamentally effect composition of the image of
>> the subject projected on the film plane." I could have left off the
>> word "plane," too, but chose to leave it because it's the film's plane
>> that is changed with swings and tilts of the rear standard.
>>
>>
>
> Well, if we're going to get into matters of precise language, you mean
> "affect", not "effect" in the above...
>
>
>
>
> Peter
>
>
Yes, you're right, affect, as in to influence... (I like ellipses, too--but
then I prefer the em dash to the plain old vanilla dash...)
--
Regards,
Matt Clara
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.mattclara.com" target="_blank">www.mattclara.com</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Rear tilt focus? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
