> > How about some advice on film. I have heard a lot about Portra VC and
NC
> > film. Some people say use 400 asa and some say 160 asa. I get a deal
on
> > Kodak Gold 400 film and can pick it up for next to nothing. Should I
just
> > use this? or should I spend the extra money.
>
film is film if you are having issues with exposure and lighting, once those
are figured out then choice of film can then be an incremental difference.
additionally, taking a pro film to a clueless consumer lab can be
problematic as most of the time they don't check to see that it usually
requires a different basic filter set to start from.
my usual response to the kodak vs fuji question is, what paper does the lab
run, it shouldn't make any difference, though I've always felt fuji film was
better on fuji paper. The point in the question is that the film choice, at
least between competing color neg stocks, is merely another item way down on
the list of priorities.
great film means nothing if the lighting sucks
great film CAN help if the exposure isn't spot on (almost two stops leeway
IF your lighting is excellent, if not then you just have a larger range of
choice to decide which sucks less, highlights or shadows)<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Prom photos