Pop Photography now telling what rez LCDs really are? Revi..

On Feb 14, 2:45 pm, "Joseph Meehan" <sligoNoSPAM... DeleteThis @hotmail.com>
wrote:
> I really wonder why some people get so concerned about numbers.
>
> Why should anyone care?
>
> My only concern is the final product.
>
> I guess it is the old "Mine is bigger than yours" thing for those who
> can't produce a good final product.

It all comes down to misrepresentation. Everyone, where LCDs are
concerned, Sigma and Fuji where sensors are confirmed, etc.
 >> Stay informed about: Pop Photography now telling what rez LCDs really are? Revi.. 

"RichA" <rander3127.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:08a55b59-55ce-4bf1-8bb4-fc4d7f704ac9@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> Notice the 76,000 pixel count for the rear LCD as opposed to the B.S.
> 230,000 count normally given?
>
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=26775801

Will I care what the actual resolution is as long as I can use the screen to
do what I need to to do?

Given that this mob have tested a pre-production camera and failed to
mention some features such as 20fps burst mode and complained that at
ISO3200 the IQ is only "extemely high" with NR turned off you wonder WTF
they want from a camera.
 >> Stay informed about: Pop Photography now telling what rez LCDs really are? Revi..