On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 23:04:10 -0800, David J Taylor
<david-taylor.TakeThisOut@blueyonder.co.not-this-bit.nor-this-part.uk> wrote:
> Slack wrote:
>> I'm trying to decide between these two models. The only differences
>> that I see:
>>
>> FZ5 FZ20K
>> ------------- ---------------------
>> 11 elements 13 elements
>> F2.8 to F3.3 F2.8 across the board
>>
>>
>> $$ not being an issue, is the FZ20K the clear winner here?
>>
>> tia
>
> Slack,
>
> There's a group specially for this type of SLR-like camera over at:
>
> news:rec.photo.digital.zlr
>
> and you'll find a few discussions about the FZ20 there. I'll copy your
> question over there and set follow-ups.
>
> The FZ5 is a considerably lighter camera, and therefore has different
> trade-offs. I guess you will need to compare the images directly -
> assuming the other facilities are identical. Do you need a flash
> hot-shoe, for example? If weight was important to me, I might choose the
> FZ5, as the slightly smaller aperture isn't quite so critical for lower
> light situations when you have the image stabilisation to help you.
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
>
Very much appreciated... thank you
--
Slack - headed over to rec.photo.digital.zlr<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Panosonic DMC-FZ5 vs. DMC-FZ20K