Welcome to PhotoForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer

 
   Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> Nature RSS
Next:  Southern California Wildflowers  
Author Message
michel

External


Since: Jan 29, 2005
Posts: 6



(Msg. 1) Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 7:50 am
Post subject: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer
Archived from groups: rec>photo>technique>nature (more info?)

Hi, I'm planning to go to Patagonia and Chile very soon and I'll have
a lots of mountains pic and volcanoes to take, a lot in deserted dusty
area burned by the sun in front plan with blue sky and snowcaped in
the distance. I see that my mountains pics of precedent trips t other
places are too often washed out in the sky area, and I want to get rid
of this problem. ND filter or split ND filter seems to be the answer,
but I want to know, can I use a ND filter stacked over a polariser or
it's gonna be too dark and look irreal? I always use a warming (81a)
polariser in my pic and I like the look of it. It works preety well to
me except for mountains pic. So will I get too dark skies ? I like it
very dark already although some time it's too dark. Any help ? Also, I
use kodak or fuji 400 because I have only one body and I use it with
my 170-500 Sigma with shoulder stock when I see wildlife. So as you
problably know, 400 saturate more colors.

And finally, would I be better with a split D or full ND ? I won't
bring a tripod, too heavy for a month of backpackig.

Thanks

Michel

 >> Stay informed about: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer 
Back to top
Login to vote
nevermind

External


Since: Nov 23, 2004
Posts: 20



(Msg. 2) Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 12:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"michel" <medgarevers.RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bb334b60.0501290650.1a214550@posting.google.com...

 > ND filter or split ND filter seems to be the answer,

You problem is the range of brightness in the scene is more than the film
can handle.

The split filter will help because it can reduce the light reaching the film
from the brighter part of the image, making the difference in brightness
something the film is better able to handle.

A full ND filter won't help - it will simply darken the entire image,
causing a compensation in exposure, and you get the same troublesome range
of brightness in the final image.

So try a split ND filter, buy a roll or 2 of unimportant film and PRACTICE
using the split filter before you go.

 > but I want to know, can I use a ND filter stacked over a polariser or
 > it's gonna be too dark and look irreal?

You can stack them, but be careful. If you set the split filter first,
rotating the polarizer may ruin your split ND alignment. PRACTICE before
you go - make the trial-and-error mistakes at home, not in those places you
may never see again.

 > I always use a warming (81a)
 > polariser in my pic and I like the look of it. It works preety well to
 > me except for mountains pic. So will I get too dark skies ? I like it
 > very dark already although some time it's too dark. Any help ?

The polarizer's effect changes with altitude. I have photos at sea level to
3000 ft (1000 m) that have very pleasant polarized skies. But I also have
shots at 9000 ft (3000 m) that have skies nearly black and quite
unpleasant - ruined the pictures. You can see it thru the viewfinder - if
it looks too dark to your eye thru the viewfinder, it will be too dark on
the film.

 > I won't bring a tripod, too heavy for a month of backpackig.

I don't carry a tripod, either - I'm partially disabled and minimize the
amount of stuff in my packpack because of it. But when I head into the
wilderness, I replace my cane with a monopod, a good one (Bogen). It serves
as a cane or walking stick, and does wonders for the sharpness of telephoto
shots. I highly recommend it.

Bob in Las Vegas<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

 >> Stay informed about: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer 
Back to top
Login to vote
sligojoe_spamn

External


Since: Nov 29, 2004
Posts: 415



(Msg. 3) Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 4:36 pm
Post subject: Re: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

michel wrote:
 > Hi, I'm planning to go to Patagonia and Chile very soon and I'll have
 > a lots of mountains pic and volcanoes to take, a lot in deserted dusty
 > area burned by the sun in front plan with blue sky and snowcaped in
 > the distance. I see that my mountains pics of precedent trips t other
 > places are too often washed out in the sky area, and I want to get rid
 > of this problem. ND filter or split ND filter seems to be the answer

Don't bother with a straight ND as it will just cause your camera to
increase exposure to properly expose the rest of the image. The Split or
gradient ND may do what you want.
,
 > but I want to know, can I use a ND filter stacked over a polariser or
 > it's gonna be too dark and look irreal?

You camera will make adjustments so it is not too dark overall. Have
you used a polarizer before? That may be enough by itself, assuming the sun
is at the correct angle.

 > I always use a warming (81a)
 > polariser in my pic and I like the look of it. It works preety well to
 > me except for mountains pic.

I suggest you get a regular warming filter with out polarizing to use
when you don't need or want polarizing. You also may want to experiment with
different films to find one that is a little warmer by nature.

 > So will I get too dark skies ? I like it
 > very dark already although some time it's too dark. Any help ? Also, I
 > use kodak or fuji 400 because I have only one body and I use it with
 > my 170-500 Sigma with shoulder stock when I see wildlife. So as you
 > problably know, 400 saturate more colors.
 >
 > And finally, would I be better with a split D or full ND ? I won't
 > bring a tripod, too heavy for a month of backpackig.
 >
 > Thanks
 >
 > Michel

--
Joseph Meehan

26 + 6 = 1 It's Irish Math<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer 
Back to top
Login to vote
user211

External


Since: Jun 23, 2004
Posts: 1182



(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 3:34 am
Post subject: Re: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"xyzzy" <nevermind RemoveThis @neverland.net> wrote in message
news:J8RKd.33$LM5.13@fed1read04...
 > "michel" <medgarevers RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote in
 > message news:bb334b60.0501290650.1a214550@posting.google.com...
[SNIP]
  > > I won't bring a tripod, too heavy for a month of
  > > backpackig.
 >
 > I don't carry a tripod, either - I'm partially disabled and
 > minimize the amount of stuff in my packpack because of
 > it. But when I head into the wilderness, I replace my
 > cane with a monopod, a good one (Bogen). It serves
 > as a cane or walking stick, and does wonders for the
 > sharpness of telephoto shots. I highly recommend it.
 >
 > Bob in Las Vegas
 >

The Gitzo Monotrek is a good option for this too - basically a treking pole
with a cover on top that can be taken off to reveal a small ball and socket
head. I think a few other makers do something similar, but the Gitzo is the
one I'm familiar with - it's very well made.


Peter<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer 
Back to top
Login to vote
anonymous2

External


Since: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 326



(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 3:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"michel" <medgarevers RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bb334b60.0501290650.1a214550@posting.google.com...
 > Hi, I'm planning to go to Patagonia and Chile very soon and I'll have
 > a lots of mountains pic and volcanoes to take, a lot in deserted dusty
 > area burned by the sun in front plan with blue sky and snowcaped in
 > the distance. I see that my mountains pics of precedent trips t other
 > places are too often washed out in the sky area, and I want to get rid
 > of this problem. ND filter or split ND filter seems to be the answer,
 > but I want to know, can I use a ND filter stacked over a polariser or
 > it's gonna be too dark and look irreal? I always use a warming (81a)
 > polariser in my pic and I like the look of it. It works preety well to
 > me except for mountains pic. So will I get too dark skies ? I like it
 > very dark already although some time it's too dark. Any help ? Also, I
 > use kodak or fuji 400 because I have only one body and I use it with
 > my 170-500 Sigma with shoulder stock when I see wildlife. So as you
 > problably know, 400 saturate more colors.
 >
 > And finally, would I be better with a split D or full ND ? I won't
 > bring a tripod, too heavy for a month of backpackig.
 >
 > Thanks
 >
 > Michel

I haven't done any photography in the mountains so I can't say if you'd find
the combination of a split ND and a polarizer to be too much. There are
other reasons why you want might to use those two filters together such as
when you want to control a reflection in a lake or other body of water. Keep
in mind that a DOF preview is practically a necessity for using a split ND.
I recommend you use a tripod with a split ND too. I have a Velbon MAX 343
that weigh 2.3lbs. It's very stable and I take it with me every where I go.
Good luck,
me<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer 
Back to top
Login to vote
kenellis

External


Since: Nov 02, 2004
Posts: 98



(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2005 5:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 29 Jan 2005 06:50:26 -0800, medgarevers.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com (michel) wrote:

 >Hi, I'm planning to go to Patagonia and Chile very soon and I'll have
 >a lots of mountains pic and volcanoes to take, a lot in deserted dusty
 >area burned by the sun in front plan with blue sky and snowcaped in
 >the distance. I see that my mountains pics of precedent trips t other
 >places are too often washed out in the sky area, and I want to get rid
 >of this problem. ND filter or split ND filter seems to be the answer,
 >but I want to know, can I use a ND filter stacked over a polariser or
 >it's gonna be too dark and look irreal? I always use a warming (81a)
 >polariser in my pic and I like the look of it. It works preety well to
 >me except for mountains pic. So will I get too dark skies ? I like it
 >very dark already although some time it's too dark. Any help ? Also, I
 >use kodak or fuji 400 because I have only one body and I use it with
 >my 170-500 Sigma with shoulder stock when I see wildlife. So as you
 >problably know, 400 saturate more colors.
 >
 >And finally, would I be better with a split D or full ND ? I won't
 >bring a tripod, too heavy for a month of backpackig.
 >
 >Thanks
 >
 >Michel

I've found polarizers are great for increased contrast and those blue
sky shots you want. The color has to be there though, or the polarizer
won't do as much. They aren't worth much on a cloudy day. A circular
will be better...you can rotate it to dark..or take the dark out(turn
it the other way which will reduce it's stop effect). They work best
when the sun is 90 deg perpendicular to your shot. A hood helps as
they add to the flare..but to some extent you can use your hand to act
like a hood a little.

A couple graduated ND's would be really nice to have...one with
moderate contrast, and one with alot. You will wan't the alot one.
Also..i would definately get a full ND...as it's nice to be able to
really slow your shutter speed down for those water shot's; and in
this regard a polarizer is interesting because it adds stops..and
changes the effect (take a couple of water because you may want the
shiny reflect..that's why the circular is nice).

You definately can stack them. Sometimes i use a mild graduated nd
with the polarizer ...depends on what you are trying to do. I don't
use the cokin holder anymore...i just hold the nd where i want
it...sometimes i turn it - not straight up and down. Buy the larger
size nd...in case you get a wide angle and want to use it on all your
lenses. Kep them in the cases..they scratch easy (cokin). ND's are
great on cloudy days.

Definately bring a tripod or at least a monopod. They are great for
balance when in a stream bed (like a walking stick) and there are some
pretty light weight ones. Better quality shots too btw and make a nice
club. Monopods are nice for getting the cam over stuff for macros too.
Use your imagination.

I envy you..that is some truly wonderfu country.

rgds

Ken<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer 
Back to top
Login to vote
sligojoe_spamn

External


Since: Nov 29, 2004
Posts: 415



(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2005 6:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Ken Ellis wrote:

 > ...

 > I've found polarizers are great for increased contrast and those blue
 > sky shots you want. The color has to be there though, or the polarizer
 > won't do as much. They aren't worth much on a cloudy day. A circular
 > will be better...you can rotate it to dark..or take the dark out(turn
 > it the other way which will reduce it's stop effect).

That should be two sentences. While a circular is generally better
since you don't need to worry about what the camera requires (some camera's
automatic systems can be fooled by a polarized light and the circular
plarizer un-polarizes the light before it goes to the camera. There is
absolutely no difference between the two in their use or the results.

 > They work best
 > when the sun is 90 deg perpendicular to your shot. A hood helps as
 > they add to the flare..but to some extent you can use your hand to act
 > like a hood a little.
 >
 > A couple graduated ND's would be really nice to have...one with
 > moderate contrast, and one with alot. You will wan't the alot one.
 > Also..i would definately get a full ND...as it's nice to be able to
 > really slow your shutter speed down for those water shot's; and in
 > this regard a polarizer is interesting because it adds stops..and
 > changes the effect (take a couple of water because you may want the
 > shiny reflect..that's why the circular is nice).
 >
 > You definately can stack them. Sometimes i use a mild graduated nd
 > with the polarizer ...depends on what you are trying to do. I don't
 > use the cokin holder anymore...i just hold the nd where i want
 > it...sometimes i turn it - not straight up and down. Buy the larger
 > size nd...in case you get a wide angle and want to use it on all your
 > lenses. Kep them in the cases..they scratch easy (cokin). ND's are
 > great on cloudy days.
 >
 > Definately bring a tripod or at least a monopod. They are great for
 > balance when in a stream bed (like a walking stick) and there are some
 > pretty light weight ones. Better quality shots too btw and make a nice
 > club. Monopods are nice for getting the cam over stuff for macros too.
 > Use your imagination.
 >
 > I envy you..that is some truly wonderfu country.
 >
 > rgds
 >
 > Ken

--
Joseph Meehan

26 + 6 = 1 It's Irish Math<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer 
Back to top
Login to vote
kenellis

External


Since: Nov 02, 2004
Posts: 98



(Msg. 8) Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:40 am
Post subject: Re: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 23:05:19 GMT, "Joseph Meehan"
<sligojoe_Spamno DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote:

 >Ken Ellis wrote:
 >
  >> ...
 >
  >> I've found polarizers are great for increased contrast and those blue
  >> sky shots you want. The color has to be there though, or the polarizer
  >> won't do as much. They aren't worth much on a cloudy day. A circular
  >> will be better...you can rotate it to dark..or take the dark out(turn
  >> it the other way which will reduce it's stop effect).
 >
 > That should be two sentences. While a circular is generally better

nope...maybe if i was writing prose or a paper (gafl)

 >since you don't need to worry about what the camera requires (some camera's
 >automatic systems can be fooled by a polarized light and the circular
 >plarizer un-polarizes the light before it goes to the camera. There is
 >absolutely no difference between the two in their use or the results.

mmmm...lotta people don't think so. see;
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=005IPw" target="_blank">http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=005IPw</a>

  >> They work best
  >> when the sun is 90 deg perpendicular to your shot. A hood helps as
  >> they add to the flare..but to some extent you can use your hand to act
  >> like a hood a little.
  >>
  >> A couple graduated ND's would be really nice to have...one with
  >> moderate contrast, and one with alot. You will wan't the alot one.
  >> Also..i would definately get a full ND...as it's nice to be able to
  >> really slow your shutter speed down for those water shot's; and in
  >> this regard a polarizer is interesting because it adds stops..and
  >> changes the effect (take a couple of water because you may want the
  >> shiny reflect..that's why the circular is nice).
  >>
  >> You definately can stack them. Sometimes i use a mild graduated nd
  >> with the polarizer ...depends on what you are trying to do. I don't
  >> use the cokin holder anymore...i just hold the nd where i want
  >> it...sometimes i turn it - not straight up and down. Buy the larger
  >> size nd...in case you get a wide angle and want to use it on all your
  >> lenses. Kep them in the cases..they scratch easy (cokin). ND's are
  >> great on cloudy days.
  >>
  >> Definately bring a tripod or at least a monopod. They are great for
  >> balance when in a stream bed (like a walking stick) and there are some
  >> pretty light weight ones. Better quality shots too btw and make a nice
  >> club. Monopods are nice for getting the cam over stuff for macros too.
  >> Use your imagination.
  >>
  >> I envy you..that is some truly wonderfu country.
  >>
  >> rgds
  >>
  >> Ken

cheers
Ken again<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer 
Back to top
Login to vote
anonymous2

External


Since: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 326



(Msg. 9) Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Ken Ellis" <kenellis.TakeThisOut@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:ndmh01dimu5u6j3nhgj9i5vf93hdrnc528@4ax.com...
 > On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 23:05:19 GMT, "Joseph Meehan"
 > <sligojoe_Spamno.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote:
  > >Ken Ellis wrote:
  > >
  > >since you don't need to worry about what the camera requires (some
camera's
  > >automatic systems can be fooled by a polarized light and the circular
  > >plarizer un-polarizes the light before it goes to the camera. There is
  > >absolutely no difference between the two in their use or the results.
 >
 > mmmm...lotta people don't think so. see;
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=005IPw</font" target="_blank">http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=005IPw</font</a>>

Dear Ken:
I have both linear and circular polarizers which I use on my 1978 Pentax and
I can assure you that on my camera there is no difference whatsoever either
in their usage or their effect on the photo. The link you cite is about the
use of polarizers and cross polorization of light sources in a studio
setting. Even so the only conflicting opinion was from Garry Edwards and
even he did not make it clear if he was referring to polarizers in general
or only the very special circumstances of cross polorized light use in a
studio. Bob Atkins who IIRC is the chief moderator of photo.net also agreed
that there is no difference between these two polarizers except for their
effect on certain autofocus and metering systems.
Film best,
me<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer 
Back to top
Login to vote
sligojoe_spamn

External


Since: Nov 29, 2004
Posts: 415



(Msg. 10) Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 2:41 pm
Post subject: Re: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Ken Ellis wrote:
 > On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 23:05:19 GMT, "Joseph Meehan"
 > <sligojoe_Spamno.DeleteThis@hotmail.com> wrote:
 >
  >> Ken Ellis wrote:
  >>
   >>> ...
  >>
   >>> I've found polarizers are great for increased contrast and those
   >>> blue sky shots you want. The color has to be there though, or the
   >>> polarizer won't do as much. They aren't worth much on a cloudy day.
   >>> A circular will be better...you can rotate it to dark..or take the
   >>> dark out(turn it the other way which will reduce it's stop effect).
  >>
  >> That should be two sentences. While a circular is generally
  >> better
 >
 > nope...maybe if i was writing prose or a paper (gafl)
 >
  >> since you don't need to worry about what the camera requires (some
  >> camera's automatic systems can be fooled by a polarized light and
  >> the circular plarizer un-polarizes the light before it goes to the
  >> camera. There is absolutely no difference between the two in their
  >> use or the results.
 >
 > mmmm...lotta people don't think so. see;
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=005IPw</font" target="_blank">http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=005IPw</font</a>>
 >

I assume you mean a lot of people don't think (there is a difference).

"the type of polarizer should have no effect on your images."

"Linear and circulat polarizers DO have the same effect"

"Certainly you don't need to change your camera polariser to make it work
with your lighting gels, but it's a pity that you paid extra for the
circular polariser in the first place when you don't need it...."

--
Joseph Meehan

26 + 6 = 1 It's Irish Math<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer 
Back to top
Login to vote
kenellis

External


Since: Nov 02, 2004
Posts: 98



(Msg. 11) Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:27:21 -0600, "me" <anonymous.RemoveThis@_.com> wrote:

 >"Ken Ellis" <kenellis.RemoveThis@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
 >news:ndmh01dimu5u6j3nhgj9i5vf93hdrnc528@4ax.com...
  >> On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 23:05:19 GMT, "Joseph Meehan"
  >> <sligojoe_Spamno.RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote:
   >> >Ken Ellis wrote:
   >> >
   >> >since you don't need to worry about what the camera requires (some
 >camera's
   >> >automatic systems can be fooled by a polarized light and the circular
   >> >plarizer un-polarizes the light before it goes to the camera. There is
   >> >absolutely no difference between the two in their use or the results.
  >>
  >> mmmm...lotta people don't think so. see;
<font color=green>  >> <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=005IPw</font" target="_blank">http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=005IPw</font</a>>
 >
 >Dear Ken:
 >I have both linear and circular polarizers which I use on my 1978 Pentax and
 >I can assure you that on my camera there is no difference whatsoever either
 >in their usage or their effect on the photo. The link you cite is about the
 >use of polarizers and cross polorization of light sources in a studio
 >setting. Even so the only conflicting opinion was from Garry Edwards and
 >even he did not make it clear if he was referring to polarizers in general
 >or only the very special circumstances of cross polorized light use in a
 >studio. Bob Atkins who IIRC is the chief moderator of photo.net also agreed
 >that there is no difference between these two polarizers except for their
 >effect on certain autofocus and metering systems.
 >Film best,
 >me
 >
Dear me

I have a 20D and to me that's salient; but i see your point as well.

rgds

Ken<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Newbie ask using ND filter with polarizer 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> Nature All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]