GREEN VIGNETTING Sigma DP-1

On Feb 26, 9:29 pm, nospam wrote:
> In article
> ,
>
> RichA wrote:
> > Some kind of odd angle of incidence issue with the 3 layer sensor?
>
> it's probably metamerism.
>
> look at #8, with the blotchy purple skies.
>
> <http://www.sigma-dp1.com/sample-photo/img/SigmaDP1-008.jpg>

Wow, don't they look at them before putting them online?!
 >> Stay informed about: GREEN VIGNETTING Sigma DP-1 

"RichA" wrote in message

> Check out shot #10
>
> http://www.sigma-dp1.com/sample-photo/
>
> Some kind of odd angle of incidence issue with the 3 layer sensor?

So now you're "stealing" from other people's posts on dpreview?
 >> Stay informed about: GREEN VIGNETTING Sigma DP-1 

On Feb 26, 7:48 pm, "Pete Stavrakoglou" wrote:
> "RichA" wrote in message
>
>
>
> > Check out shot #10
>
> >http://www.sigma-dp1.com/sample-photo/
>
> > Some kind of odd angle of incidence issue with the 3 layer sensor?
>
> So now you're "stealing" from other people's posts on dpreview?

Oh! Sorry, I didn't know it was copyrighted. So if a newspaper comes
out in the evening, and a story was reported in a different paper
earlier that afternoon, that evening paper now has to cite the
afternoon paper? The guy who posted DIDN'T take the images.
 >> Stay informed about: GREEN VIGNETTING Sigma DP-1 

"RichA" wrote in message

> On Feb 26, 7:48 pm, "Pete Stavrakoglou" wrote:
>> "RichA" wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>> > Check out shot #10
>>
>> >http://www.sigma-dp1.com/sample-photo/
>>
>> > Some kind of odd angle of incidence issue with the 3 layer sensor?
>>
>> So now you're "stealing" from other people's posts on dpreview?
>
> Oh! Sorry, I didn't know it was copyrighted. So if a newspaper comes
> out in the evening, and a story was reported in a different paper
> earlier that afternoon, that evening paper now has to cite the
> afternoon paper? The guy who posted DIDN'T take the images.

Give it a rest and try to come up with an original idea.
 >> Stay informed about: GREEN VIGNETTING Sigma DP-1 

In article , TRoss
wrote:

> Rander pretty much lifted his comment from a thread on dpreview. See
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1000&message=26947193
>
> It's not the first time he's taken something from a DPR forum and
> reposted it to Usenet without attribution.

Well, bottom line is that the picture sucked. Considering it came out
of a Sigma digital camera, should anyone be surprised?
 >> Stay informed about: GREEN VIGNETTING Sigma DP-1 

In article , Mr. Strat
wrote:

> Well, bottom line is that the picture sucked. Considering it came out
> of a Sigma digital camera, should anyone be surprised?

for what it's worth, they've fixed the image. that means that not only
did they not look at them before initially posting them, but also that
these samples are *processed* files and not directly from the camera.
 >> Stay informed about: GREEN VIGNETTING Sigma DP-1 

In article , nospam
wrote:

> for what it's worth, they've fixed the image. that means that not only
> did they not look at them before initially posting them, but also that
> these samples are *processed* files and not directly from the camera.

Imagine that...
 >> Stay informed about: GREEN VIGNETTING Sigma DP-1