Welcome to PhotoForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Old Dr. Krugener Preminar Lens

 
   Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> Large Format RSS
Next:  Pand S  
Author Message
user211

External


Since: Jun 23, 2004
Posts: 1182



(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 1:53 pm
Post subject: Old Dr. Krugener Preminar Lens
Archived from groups: rec>photo>equipment>large-format (more info?)

I've just acquired a lens that I know vritually nothing about, and wondered
if anyone could enlighten me...

Around the bezel is written:

"Dr. R. Krugener's. Doppel Anastigmat. Preminar. F = 128. 1:6,8."

It is indeed an f6.8, and the focal length does seem to be about 128mm.
Apertures are marked as: 6.8; 9; 12; 18; 25; and 36 with a twelve bladed
diaphragm. It's mounted in a shutter with speeds set by a sliding lever:
25; 50; 100; Z; and O. 'O' seems to work like 'T' normally does, but I
haven't worked out 'Z' yet - it seems to produce a speed that is,
subjectively, a bit faster than that for the marked 100. The shutter has
just two actuating levers, one to cock it and one to release. It's in
rather nice black lacquered brass and nickel plate, and has a roundel at 12
o'clock (where the dial would be if it was dial set, which it isn't) that
bears a monogram that seems to be " D r K R " - which makes sense.

At first I thought the shutter was a compound as there are two air cylinders
at the top, behind the roundel mentioned above. However, on looking closer
it seems these are for an air operated release: the smaller cylinder has a
screw thread for an air 'hose' and this feeds the larger cylinder which has
a small piston that emerges to press on a small lever that fires the
shutter. Very neat.

Looking at the ground glass image it looks quite nice, and has a huge circle
of illumination, though sharpness falls off quite fast - I suspect it would
illuminate 4x5 easily (haven't tried yet) but would probably have soft
corners on anything much larger than 6x9. I'll certainly shoot some film
with it to find out, but so far I've only just looked at the GG image.

I know Krugener (There's actually an umlaut over the 'U') was making cameras
in the late 1800s, and that Huttig, Krugener & Wunsche was one of the
companies that went into ICA (in 1909) and so eventually became part of
Zeiss Ikon, hence the Preminar name being used on some of their lenses. But
that's about all I know on this subject.

Anyone know any more? I'm rather intrigued by this, as it is obviously
quite early, and obviously very well made.

Thanks,



Peter

--

http://www.bard-hill.co.uk

 >> Stay informed about: Old Dr. Krugener Preminar Lens 
Back to top
Login to vote
dickburk

External


Since: Jul 01, 2004
Posts: 1173



(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 4:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Old Dr. Krugener Preminar Lens [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Bandicoot" <"insert_handle_here"@techemail.com> wrote in
message news:1106148334.22824.0@lotis.uk.clara.net...
 > I've just acquired a lens that I know vritually nothing
 > about, and wondered
 > if anyone could enlighten me...
 >
 > Around the bezel is written:
 >
 > "Dr. R. Krugener's. Doppel Anastigmat. Preminar. F = 128.
 > 1:6,8."
 >
 > It is indeed an f6.8, and the focal length does seem to be
 > about 128mm.
 > Apertures are marked as: 6.8; 9; 12; 18; 25; and 36 with a
 > twelve bladed
 > diaphragm. It's mounted in a shutter with speeds set by a
 > sliding lever:
 > 25; 50; 100; Z; and O. 'O' seems to work like 'T'
 > normally does, but I
 > haven't worked out 'Z' yet - it seems to produce a speed
 > that is,
 > subjectively, a bit faster than that for the marked 100.
 > The shutter has
 > just two actuating levers, one to cock it and one to
 > release. It's in
 > rather nice black lacquered brass and nickel plate, and
 > has a roundel at 12
 > o'clock (where the dial would be if it was dial set, which
 > it isn't) that
 > bears a monogram that seems to be " D r K R " - which
 > makes sense.
 >
 > At first I thought the shutter was a compound as there are
 > two air cylinders
 > at the top, behind the roundel mentioned above. However,
 > on looking closer
 > it seems these are for an air operated release: the
 > smaller cylinder has a
 > screw thread for an air 'hose' and this feeds the larger
 > cylinder which has
 > a small piston that emerges to press on a small lever that
 > fires the
 > shutter. Very neat.
 >
 > Looking at the ground glass image it looks quite nice, and
 > has a huge circle
 > of illumination, though sharpness falls off quite fast - I
 > suspect it would
 > illuminate 4x5 easily (haven't tried yet) but would
 > probably have soft
 > corners on anything much larger than 6x9. I'll certainly
 > shoot some film
 > with it to find out, but so far I've only just looked at
 > the GG image.
 >
 > I know Krugener (There's actually an umlaut over the 'U')
 > was making cameras
 > in the late 1800s, and that Huttig, Krugener & Wunsche was
 > one of the
 > companies that went into ICA (in 1909) and so eventually
 > became part of
 > Zeiss Ikon, hence the Preminar name being used on some of
 > their lenses. But
 > that's about all I know on this subject.
 >
 > Anyone know any more? I'm rather intrigued by this, as it
 > is obviously
 > quite early, and obviously very well made.
 >
 > Thanks,
 >
 >
 >
 > Peter
 >
 > --
 >
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.bard-hill.co.uk</font" target="_blank">http://www.bard-hill.co.uk</font</a>>
 >
My guess is that its a variation of the Dagor. Try
counting reflections from the cells. Use a small flashlight.
Glass-air surfaces are very bright, cemented surfaces are
dim. A Dagor or similar will have two bright and two dim
reflections in each cell.


--
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk RemoveThis @ix.netcom.com<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

 >> Stay informed about: Old Dr. Krugener Preminar Lens 
Back to top
Login to vote
user211

External


Since: Jun 23, 2004
Posts: 1182



(Msg. 3) Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 2:13 am
Post subject: Re: Old Dr. Krugener Preminar Lens [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Richard Knoppow" <dickburk DeleteThis @ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:3601a7F4n151iU1@individual.net...
 >
 > "Bandicoot" <"insert_handle_here"@techemail.com> wrote
 > in message news:1106148334.22824.0@lotis.uk.clara.net...
  > > I've just acquired a lens that I know vritually nothing
  > > about, and wondered if anyone could enlighten me...
  > >
  > > Around the bezel is written:
  > >
  > > "Dr. R. Krugener's. Doppel Anastigmat. Preminar. F =
  > > 128. 1:6,8."
  > >
[SNIP
  > >
 > My guess is that its a variation of the Dagor. Try
 > counting reflections from the cells. Use a small flashlight.
 > Glass-air surfaces are very bright, cemented surfaces are
 > dim. A Dagor or similar will have two bright and two dim
 > reflections in each cell.
 >

Thanks - I'll have a look when I can and post my results (visitors staying
this weekend and the lens is in a box in the room in which they've already
gone to bed, so I can't do it right away, much as I'd like to!)



Peter<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Old Dr. Krugener Preminar Lens 
Back to top
Login to vote
user211

External


Since: Jun 23, 2004
Posts: 1182



(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2005 6:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Old Dr. Krugener Preminar Lens [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Richard Knoppow" <dickburk.TakeThisOut@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:3601a7F4n151iU1@individual.net...
 >
 > "Bandicoot" <"insert_handle_here"@techemail.com> wrote in
 > message news:1106148334.22824.0@lotis.uk.clara.net...
  > > I've just acquired a lens that I know vritually nothing
  > > about, and wondered
  > > if anyone could enlighten me...
  > >
  > > Around the bezel is written:
  > >
  > > "Dr. R. Krugener's. Doppel Anastigmat. Preminar. F = 128.
  > > 1:6,8."
  > >
[SNIP]
  > >
 > My guess is that its a variation of the Dagor. Try
 > counting reflections from the cells. Use a small flashlight.
 > Glass-air surfaces are very bright, cemented surfaces are
 > dim. A Dagor or similar will have two bright and two dim
 > reflections in each cell.
 >

Thanks Richard,

Visitors gone, then I was away working (architectural shots).
Now back, and the lens is on the desk in front of me.

Yes, there are definitely two bright and two dim reflections in
each cell, and - subjectively - the cells look to be identical,
suggesting a symmetrical formula.

Anything useful I should infer from this information? Obviously,
the next thing to do is actually to shoot soem film with it...

Thanks again,



Peter<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Old Dr. Krugener Preminar Lens 
Back to top
Login to vote
dickburk

External


Since: Jul 01, 2004
Posts: 1173



(Msg. 5) Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 7:31 am
Post subject: Re: Old Dr. Krugener Preminar Lens [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Bandicoot wrote:
 > "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk.RemoveThis@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
 > news:3601a7F4n151iU1@individual.net...
  > >
  > > "Bandicoot" <"insert_handle_here"@techemail.com> wrote in
  > > message news:1106148334.22824.0@lotis.uk.clara.net...
   > > > I've just acquired a lens that I know vritually nothing
   > > > about, and wondered
   > > > if anyone could enlighten me...
   > > >
   > > > Around the bezel is written:
   > > >
   > > > "Dr. R. Krugener's. Doppel Anastigmat. Preminar. F = 128.
   > > > 1:6,8."
   > > >
 > [SNIP]
   > > >
  > > My guess is that its a variation of the Dagor. Try
  > > counting reflections from the cells. Use a small flashlight.
  > > Glass-air surfaces are very bright, cemented surfaces are
  > > dim. A Dagor or similar will have two bright and two dim
  > > reflections in each cell.
  > >
 >
 > Thanks Richard,
 >
 > Visitors gone, then I was away working (architectural shots).
 > Now back, and the lens is on the desk in front of me.
 >
 > Yes, there are definitely two bright and two dim reflections in
 > each cell, and - subjectively - the cells look to be identical,
 > suggesting a symmetrical formula.
 >
 > Anything useful I should infer from this information? Obviously,
 > the next thing to do is actually to shoot soem film with it...
 >
 > Thanks again,
 >
 >
 >
 > Peter

That makes it a Dagor or some variation. Each cell of a Dagor
consists of three elements which are cemented. There are four
permutations of the powers. The Dagor as made by Goerz and Zeiss, has
positive elements on the outside and a negative elements on the inside.
A reverse form is described in the original patent. This was used by
Zeiss under the name Triple Protar and for the Schneider Angulon Wide
Angle lens. A third variation was used by Voigtlander and Steinheil.
All have similar performance although the Goerz Dagor form is thiner
for given glass types.
All of these have the properties of being essentially wide angle
lenses with coverage of nearly 90 degrees when operated at around f/45.
They also have a considerable amount of zonal spherical aberration
which makes them slightly soft when wide open. Spherical varies with
the stop and in the Dagor is gone at around f/16. Optimum for "normal"
coverage (focal length equal to the format diagonal) is around f/22.
When stopped down the lenses are quite sharp. The symmetry gives them
relative lack of coma and very good color correction, at least for
lateral color.
Dagors and similar lenses were very widely used for general
photogaphy for decades. A single cell can be used at about 1.8X the
focal length of the combined lens. Because the individual cells are not
corrected for coma they must be stopped down quite a lot to get them
sharp, perhaps f/36 or more. When used behind the stop the speed is
about f/13. The cell can be used in front of the stop but there is a
little more field curvature there. However, the necessary bellows draw
is shortened due to the slight telephoto effect of single meniscus
lenses when the concave side faces the film.
A great many Dagor knock-offs were made under many names for
decades.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Old Dr. Krugener Preminar Lens 
Back to top
Login to vote
user211

External


Since: Jun 23, 2004
Posts: 1182



(Msg. 6) Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Old Dr. Krugener Preminar Lens [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Richard Knoppow" <dickburk.DeleteThis@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:1107873110.825540.122100@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
[SNIP]

Thank you very much for that Richard - very interesting and useful, as ever.

Now to shoot some film...


Peter
 >> Stay informed about: Old Dr. Krugener Preminar Lens 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> Large Format All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]