> Quick report on my DR XT and underexposure, particularly when using flash.
>
> I'm still a newbie when it comes to metering amongst other things. It
seems
> the DR XT is still up to a stop underexposed without flash, and much more
> underexposed when using the built-in flash.
>
> I took some shots last night while cooking and with no exposure or flash
> exposure compensation the photos looked dark and there were no bits in
more
> than the right third of the histogram. Bumping up FEC by a full stop
moved
> the histogram to the right considerably but the photos were still
> underexposed.
>
> What's the best set of shots to determine how far off the flash metering
is?
> I was in the kitchen with a few 100 watt bulbs and a lot of white paint.
> But then I tested on a bookshelf with mostly dark books in a dim dining
room
> with the same results.
>
> Is anybody else seeing this with their XTs?
I'm certainly not - it's VERY rare for me to get an over- or under-exposed
image with my D350 - unless it's my fault.
In fact, it even makes it harder for me to make a mistake. For indoor
shots, I find myself getting lazy and doing things like setting it to
"manual", and choosing a shutter/aperture value that would normally be very
underexposed, and letting my Sigma flash take care of the rest - as the TTL
metering shuts it off when it finds there's been enough light, exposure is
*remarkably* good that way.
.. With my first D300, I had severe underexposures with the external flash,
but not with on-board flash. I tried various flashes from Sigma and Canon,
all with the same results. However, the flashes worked fine on other
D300's. I sent it back, and waited and bought the D350, which works
wonderfully. However, because that D300 underexposed consistently where
others would not, I strongly suspect that it was defective, and although I'm
not going to jump to that conclusion right away with yours, keep it in mind
as a possibility.
steve<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Digital Rebel XT underexposure