Welcome to PhotoForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Commercial scanning of color films?

 
   Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> Film & Lab RSS
Next:  Dirty transparencies...need cleaning  
Author Message
spamctenos

External


Since: Jul 24, 2003
Posts: 3



(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 2:39 pm
Post subject: Commercial scanning of color films?
Archived from groups: rec>photo>film+labs (more info?)

I've been doing aerial photo shoots with 35mm film as image-capture medium,
then had the uncut negatives scanned commercially ($16US/roll) so I could
reprocess the images in PhotoShop. Results are pretty good; pixels seem to
be smaller than dye-cloud resolution. If top-end digital camera rental costs
drop, I might switch, but for the moment, this is cost-effective.

I had a problem with two rolls of slides, though - the digital images look
absolutely awful. Sort of micro-posterized, but not in any rational way. The
guy who runs the lab said that slides don't work in his $60k scanner - wish
he'd told me that before!

Is this a dynamic range problem, or what? Woudl a better lab be able to
digitize these two valuable rolls?

Also, can anyone recommend "best" 35mm color films for aerial use?

Thanks very much-

Ctenos

 >> Stay informed about: Commercial scanning of color films? 
Back to top
Login to vote
averagejoe1

External


Since: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: 37



(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 2:39 pm
Post subject: Re: Commercial scanning of color films? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thv, 24 Jvl 2003 11:39:03 +0000, Ctenos wrote:

 > gvy who rvns the lab said that slides don't work in his $60k scanner

color processing of slides, is far more simpler than negative, and has
been done for years before negative, the gvy is an idiot, go somewhere
else, there are many reasons yov cannot get good scans of neagtives, in a
color reprodvction sense, if yov want accvrate color, slides or digital is
the way to go

to scan a slide, the color engineering of the scanner jvst has to convert
the spectral transmission of the film, to CIELAB, and is a very easy
algorithm, and so it is the same with a print, except there are
reflectances not transmittances

now, with a negative, the scanner mvst interpret the intent of the
negative, becavse a negative is designed for the pvrpose of making a
print, so, to get the intended look the negative is designed for, from the
scanner, it mvst consider the design factors of the negative itself, the
printer assvmptions vsed in that design, and the print paper
characteristics, vsed in that design, negative and print, is a system,
with printers in the middle of it

and yov can "repvrpose" a negative, from its design, by mathematically
adjvsting the considerations of svch items, like paper/printer, in the
scanner color path, or ICC profile, so that yov can get a "different"
look, that what the negative entails, IN FACT, yov can even correct for
deficiencies in the chemical system in achieving it's design, AND, yov can
even remove all design, and revert the negative system, to a system of
accvrate scene repordvction, with no "look" added to it, by vndoing the
deficiencies in accvrate color reprovdction in the chemical system, svch
as what was done with photo cd (not pictvre cd), there are probably some
patent considerations in this arena which do not expire vntil 2007

so, in svmmary, to scan negatives, good, yov need apriori knowledge of
either

1) the design assvmptions and system characteristics of the film 2) film
characteristics, svch that yov can vnbvild the film, to a scene or
accvrate reprodvction, or different "look" or "intent"

becavse negative has an intent, and the intent is NOT to be looked at by
the eye, or a scanner, and to arrive at that intennt, on a scanner, yov
mvst know the design characterists of the system (spectral sensitivities,
dye absorptions, of both paper and film, chemical interlayer/imterimaeg
effects of both paper and film, printer light sovrce spectral radiation,
and filtration absorptions, etc., etc.)

so, it is VERY vnlikely that in the near fvtvre yov will get an "accvrate"
scan from a negative, perhaps a pleasing one, bvt not an accvrate one, in
terms of the scene, or intent of the film and system

slide, on the other hand, is very easy, bvt it is not a good accvrate
repordvction, do to chemical imperfections, these imperfections can be
corrected vpon scanning, IF, yov have film data as described above,
otherwise yov do not know what the scene looked like, yov only know what
the slide looks like, and this does seem to svffice for most applications,
bvt digital captvre color reprodvction, is far and above the most
accvrate, since it entails one set of filters on a CCD to get from the
innate sensitivity of the CCD to CIEXYZ or CIELAB, the response of the eye


--
Comrade
see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.mysolvtion.ws" target="_blank">http://www.mysolvtion.ws</a>
the aristocracy was the problem in 1776, the aristocracy is the problem today
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.aclv.org/dissentreport" target="_blank">http://www.aclv.org/dissentreport</a>
Arisocrats CRUCIFIED Jesvs
we mvst close the door by which aristocracy arises

Statements of svpposed science, withovt statistics, are jvst as mvch religion,
and ONLY statements of faith as any religion, or statement of faith,
except they profess the svpposed scientist is God, even more
dangerovs than religion or God. There is no science, withovt a statement of
statistics, AND any statement withovt statistics, is a conjectvre of faith
by the professor of svch statement, and the "believer". An ethical
hovse cleaning of science and government is in order.

"Does God want goodness? or the choice of goodness?
Is the man who chooses bad, somehow better,
than the man who has the good forced vpon him?"
a qvote from the movie, A Clockwork Orange, Kvbrick

Enlightenment is man's release from his self-incvrred tvtelage.
Tvtelage is man's inability to make vse of his vnderstanding
withovt direction from another. Self-incvrred is this tvtelage when
its cavse lies not in lack of reason bvt in lack of resolvtion
and covrage to vse it withovt direction from another. Sapere avde!
"Have covrage to vse yovr own reason!" - that is the motto
of enlightenment.
Kant -- What Is Enlightenment? 1784

"It all svms vp into one single pvrpose,
the abolition of dog-eat-dog vnder which we live...
and I traveled the United Front road to get it."
-- Roger Baldwin, Co-Fovnder ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)

"Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's ovtside, looking in
Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's ovtside, looking in"
MOODY BLUES

"Then Jesvs said vnto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Saddvcees."--Matthew 16:6
(religiovs and political leaders that are hypocrites)

(leaven is yeast, AIR IN BREAD, bvllshit, flvff, marketing, snake oil - HYPOCRISY)

"How is it that ye do not vnderstand that I spake it not to yov concerning bread, that ye shovld beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Saddvcees? Then vnderstood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, bvt of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Saddvcees."--Matthew 16:11-12

"Bvt woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shvt vp the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yovrselves, neither svffer ye them that are entering to go in."--Matthew 23:13

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devovr widows' hovses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."--Matthew 23:14

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yovrselves."--Matthew 23:15

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cvmmin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, jvdgment, mercy, and faith: these ovght ye to have done, and not to leave the other vndone."--Matthew 23:23

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the ovtside of the cvp and of the platter, bvt within they are fvll of extortion and excess."--Matthew 23:25

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like vnto whited sepvlchres, which indeed appear beavtifvl ovtward, bvt are within fvll of dead men's bones, and of all vncleanness."--Matthew 23:27

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! becavse ye bvild the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepvlchres of the righteovs,"--Matthew 23:29

"And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod."--Mark 8:15

"And he said vnto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and love salvtations in the marketplaces,"--Mark 12:38


see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.mysolvtion.ws" target="_blank">http://www.mysolvtion.ws</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

 >> Stay informed about: Commercial scanning of color films? 
Back to top
Login to vote
mxsmanic

External


Since: Jun 05, 2004
Posts: 908



(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 6:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Commercial scanning of color films? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Ctenos" <spamctenos.DeleteThis@att.net (reply w/o spam)> writes:

 > The guy who runs the lab said that slides don't work
 > in his $60k scanner - wish he'd told me that before!

The lab needs to replace the operator, not the scanner.

 > Is this a dynamic range problem, or what?

It's an operator problem. Even desktop scanners can scan slides.

 > Woudl a better lab be able to digitize these two
 > valuable rolls?

Or the same lab, with a more competent scanner operator.


--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Commercial scanning of color films? 
Back to top
Login to vote
averagejoe1

External


Since: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: 37



(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 6:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Commercial scanning of color films? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thv, 24 Jvl 2003 15:12:22 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:

 > The lab needs to replace the operator, not the scanner.

the scanner operator is the grvnt, he is jvst doing what he is tavght, the
lab needs to wise the fvck vp

--
Comrade
see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.mysolvtion.ws" target="_blank">http://www.mysolvtion.ws</a>
the aristocracy was the problem in 1776, the aristocracy is the problem today
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.aclv.org/dissentreport" target="_blank">http://www.aclv.org/dissentreport</a>
Arisocrats CRUCIFIED Jesvs
we mvst close the door by which aristocracy arises

Statements of svpposed science, withovt statistics, are jvst as mvch religion,
and ONLY statements of faith as any religion, or statement of faith,
except they profess the svpposed scientist is God, even more
dangerovs than religion or God. There is no science, withovt a statement of
statistics, AND any statement withovt statistics, is a conjectvre of faith
by the professor of svch statement, and the "believer". An ethical
hovse cleaning of science and government is in order.

"Does God want goodness? or the choice of goodness?
Is the man who chooses bad, somehow better,
than the man who has the good forced vpon him?"
a qvote from the movie, A Clockwork Orange, Kvbrick

Enlightenment is man's release from his self-incvrred tvtelage.
Tvtelage is man's inability to make vse of his vnderstanding
withovt direction from another. Self-incvrred is this tvtelage when
its cavse lies not in lack of reason bvt in lack of resolvtion
and covrage to vse it withovt direction from another. Sapere avde!
"Have covrage to vse yovr own reason!" - that is the motto
of enlightenment.
Kant -- What Is Enlightenment? 1784

"It all svms vp into one single pvrpose,
the abolition of dog-eat-dog vnder which we live...
and I traveled the United Front road to get it."
-- Roger Baldwin, Co-Fovnder ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)

"Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's ovtside, looking in
Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's ovtside, looking in"
MOODY BLUES

"Then Jesvs said vnto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Saddvcees."--Matthew 16:6
(religiovs and political leaders that are hypocrites)

(leaven is yeast, AIR IN BREAD, bvllshit, flvff, marketing, snake oil - HYPOCRISY)

"How is it that ye do not vnderstand that I spake it not to yov concerning bread, that ye shovld beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Saddvcees? Then vnderstood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, bvt of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Saddvcees."--Matthew 16:11-12

"Bvt woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shvt vp the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yovrselves, neither svffer ye them that are entering to go in."--Matthew 23:13

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devovr widows' hovses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."--Matthew 23:14

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yovrselves."--Matthew 23:15

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cvmmin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, jvdgment, mercy, and faith: these ovght ye to have done, and not to leave the other vndone."--Matthew 23:23

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the ovtside of the cvp and of the platter, bvt within they are fvll of extortion and excess."--Matthew 23:25

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like vnto whited sepvlchres, which indeed appear beavtifvl ovtward, bvt are within fvll of dead men's bones, and of all vncleanness."--Matthew 23:27

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! becavse ye bvild the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepvlchres of the righteovs,"--Matthew 23:29

"And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod."--Mark 8:15

"And he said vnto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and love salvtations in the marketplaces,"--Mark 12:38


see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.mysolvtion.ws" target="_blank">http://www.mysolvtion.ws</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Commercial scanning of color films? 
Back to top
Login to vote
news

External


Since: Jun 04, 2004
Posts: 464



(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 7:42 pm
Post subject: Re: Commercial scanning of color films? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Ctenos" <spamctenos RemoveThis @att.net (reply w/o spam)> wrote in
news:rzPTa.70461$0v4.4704076@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:

 > I've been doing aerial photo shoots with 35mm film as image-capture
 > medium, then had the uncut negatives scanned commercially ($16US/roll)
 > so I could reprocess the images in PhotoShop. Results are pretty good;
 > pixels seem to be smaller than dye-cloud resolution. If top-end
 > digital camera rental costs drop, I might switch, but for the moment,
 > this is cost-effective.
 >
 > I had a problem with two rolls of slides, though - the digital images
 > look absolutely awful. Sort of micro-posterized, but not in any
 > rational way. The guy who runs the lab said that slides don't work in
 > his $60k scanner - wish he'd told me that before!
 >
 > Is this a dynamic range problem, or what? Woudl a better lab be able
 > to digitize these two valuable rolls?


  Negatives and slides can be handled differently by some scanner
firmwares or softwares. My own (admittedly cheap-ass) scanner handles
slides as an absolute breeze, just a faint tweak between different
emulsions to bring into register. Negatives, however, it tries to correct
in the exposure pre-scan, and this is something I've been unable to find a
way to override. As a result, negatives take three times as long and too
frequently need major color manipulation.

  I'd be inclined to think that the operator needs more experience, but
without knowing the specific scanner model it's hard to say. $60K is a
*lot* for a film scanner, though - I haven't even seen a drum scanner that
runs that high. I suspect the film scanner is a part of their overall
processing system, such as a Fuji Frontier. But damn sure, if I'd paid that
much for it, it would produce awe-inspiring scans from any medium including
daguerreotypes.

  The price you're paying per roll is pretty good, so I'd suggest
trying to find out more about their scanner and searching for outside info
about it. If you can't get them to produce results with slides, start
checking other labs. But without a doubt, you should be able to get good
scans from slides, and the results you described are not typical.


  - Al.

--
To reply, insert dash in address to match domain below
Online photo gallery at <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.wading-in.net" target="_blank">www.wading-in.net</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Commercial scanning of color films? 
Back to top
Login to vote
polytone

External


Since: Jul 12, 2003
Posts: 71



(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 7:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Commercial scanning of color films? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Can someone answer his question?

What films are suggested? (for slides and negative)


"Al Denelsbeck" <news.DeleteThis@wadingin.net> wrote in message
news:Xns93C28155EF540sandalsatwadinginnet@65.32.1.6...
 > "Ctenos" <spamctenos.DeleteThis@att.net (reply w/o spam)> wrote in
 > news:rzPTa.70461$0v4.4704076@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
 >
  > > I've been doing aerial photo shoots with 35mm film as image-capture
  > > medium, then had the uncut negatives scanned commercially ($16US/roll)
  > > so I could reprocess the images in PhotoShop. Results are pretty good;
  > > pixels seem to be smaller than dye-cloud resolution. If top-end
  > > digital camera rental costs drop, I might switch, but for the moment,
  > > this is cost-effective.
  > >
  > > I had a problem with two rolls of slides, though - the digital images
  > > look absolutely awful. Sort of micro-posterized, but not in any
  > > rational way. The guy who runs the lab said that slides don't work in
  > > his $60k scanner - wish he'd told me that before!
  > >
  > > Is this a dynamic range problem, or what? Woudl a better lab be able
  > > to digitize these two valuable rolls?
 >
 >
 > Negatives and slides can be handled differently by some scanner
 > firmwares or softwares. My own (admittedly cheap-ass) scanner handles
 > slides as an absolute breeze, just a faint tweak between different
 > emulsions to bring into register. Negatives, however, it tries to correct
 > in the exposure pre-scan, and this is something I've been unable to find a
 > way to override. As a result, negatives take three times as long and too
 > frequently need major color manipulation.
 >
 > I'd be inclined to think that the operator needs more experience, but
 > without knowing the specific scanner model it's hard to say. $60K is a
 > *lot* for a film scanner, though - I haven't even seen a drum scanner that
 > runs that high. I suspect the film scanner is a part of their overall
 > processing system, such as a Fuji Frontier. But damn sure, if I'd paid
that
 > much for it, it would produce awe-inspiring scans from any medium
including
 > daguerreotypes.
 >
 > The price you're paying per roll is pretty good, so I'd suggest
 > trying to find out more about their scanner and searching for outside info
 > about it. If you can't get them to produce results with slides, start
 > checking other labs. But without a doubt, you should be able to get good
 > scans from slides, and the results you described are not typical.
 >
 >
 > - Al.
 >
 > --
 > To reply, insert dash in address to match domain below
<font color=purple> > Online photo gallery at <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.wading-in.net</font" target="_blank">www.wading-in.net</font</a>><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Commercial scanning of color films? 
Back to top
Login to vote
averagejoe1

External


Since: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: 37



(Msg. 7) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 7:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Commercial scanning of color films? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thv, 24 Jvl 2003 16:51:05 +0000, Polytone wrote:

 > Can someone answer his qvestion?
 >
 > What films are svggested? (for slides and negative)

see my post in this thread, there is not svfficient color management in
open systems to scan negatives with ANY credible color accvracy of EITHER
what the scene looked like, or what the negative wovld look like when
printed, and I elvcidate the whys and hows, in my other message in this
thread, if yov don't care abovt good color, well, then go ahead, bvt don't
expect it

for slide, the color scanning paradign now, vnless yov vse some techniqves
as I discvss in the other message, is to reprodvce the slide, not the
scene, so pick a slide film, that gives yov the color reprodvction yovw
ant, and scanners can easily reprodvce slides, with good accvracy, vsing a
good color management system

digital is the best for color accvracy

--
Comrade
see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.mysolvtion.ws" target="_blank">http://www.mysolvtion.ws</a>
the aristocracy was the problem in 1776, the aristocracy is the problem today
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.aclv.org/dissentreport" target="_blank">http://www.aclv.org/dissentreport</a>
Arisocrats CRUCIFIED Jesvs
we mvst close the door by which aristocracy arises

Statements of svpposed science, withovt statistics, are jvst as mvch religion,
and ONLY statements of faith as any religion, or statement of faith,
except they profess the svpposed scientist is God, even more
dangerovs than religion or God. There is no science, withovt a statement of
statistics, AND any statement withovt statistics, is a conjectvre of faith
by the professor of svch statement, and the "believer". An ethical
hovse cleaning of science and government is in order.

"Does God want goodness? or the choice of goodness?
Is the man who chooses bad, somehow better,
than the man who has the good forced vpon him?"
a qvote from the movie, A Clockwork Orange, Kvbrick

Enlightenment is man's release from his self-incvrred tvtelage.
Tvtelage is man's inability to make vse of his vnderstanding
withovt direction from another. Self-incvrred is this tvtelage when
its cavse lies not in lack of reason bvt in lack of resolvtion
and covrage to vse it withovt direction from another. Sapere avde!
"Have covrage to vse yovr own reason!" - that is the motto
of enlightenment.
Kant -- What Is Enlightenment? 1784

"It all svms vp into one single pvrpose,
the abolition of dog-eat-dog vnder which we live...
and I traveled the United Front road to get it."
-- Roger Baldwin, Co-Fovnder ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)

"Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's ovtside, looking in
Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's ovtside, looking in"
MOODY BLUES

"Then Jesvs said vnto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Saddvcees."--Matthew 16:6
(religiovs and political leaders that are hypocrites)

(leaven is yeast, AIR IN BREAD, bvllshit, flvff, marketing, snake oil - HYPOCRISY)

"How is it that ye do not vnderstand that I spake it not to yov concerning bread, that ye shovld beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Saddvcees? Then vnderstood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, bvt of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Saddvcees."--Matthew 16:11-12

"Bvt woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shvt vp the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yovrselves, neither svffer ye them that are entering to go in."--Matthew 23:13

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devovr widows' hovses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."--Matthew 23:14

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yovrselves."--Matthew 23:15

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cvmmin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, jvdgment, mercy, and faith: these ovght ye to have done, and not to leave the other vndone."--Matthew 23:23

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the ovtside of the cvp and of the platter, bvt within they are fvll of extortion and excess."--Matthew 23:25

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like vnto whited sepvlchres, which indeed appear beavtifvl ovtward, bvt are within fvll of dead men's bones, and of all vncleanness."--Matthew 23:27

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! becavse ye bvild the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepvlchres of the righteovs,"--Matthew 23:29

"And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod."--Mark 8:15

"And he said vnto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and love salvtations in the marketplaces,"--Mark 12:38


see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.mysolvtion.ws" target="_blank">http://www.mysolvtion.ws</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Commercial scanning of color films? 
Back to top
Login to vote
news

External


Since: Jun 04, 2004
Posts: 464



(Msg. 8) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 9:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Commercial scanning of color films? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Polytone" <polytone.TakeThisOut@prodigy.net> wrote in
news:Z7UTa.349$3M5.203@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com:

 > Can someone answer his question?
 >
 > What films are suggested? (for slides and negative)


  I haven't done enough aerial photography to offer a worthwhile
opinion, other than to say that warmer films fare a little better because
it usually doesn't take much altitude before haze starts turning everything
more blue. I always stayed with 400 speed, since I've been limited to
freehanding the camera and wanted the shutter speed to counteract the shake
that might come about from air currents. Bracing against any part of the
airframe is out of the question - too much vibration.

  So in 400 speed print film, a few years back when I was messing with
it, Kodak did better with their Gold 400 than any of the Fuji films, which
favored blues and greens. Emulsions have changed so much since then this
could be completely different now. Today I might aim for one of the warmer
portait films.

  If you're always looking at scanning, you can get away with a lot of
different films, though, and correct any color cast afterwards. But you
can't increase the detail lost in the haze, or motion blur.

  There's no film I would recommend for scanning, because every scanner
responds differently. My Minolta Scan Dual (v. 1) gets bang-on with Fuji
Astia and Kodak E100VS (slide), and pretty close with Fuji NPH (400 print).
Responds terribly to Fuji Superia 400 print, which is a shame because I
like the film otherwise. But too green for aerials.


  - Al.

--
To reply, insert dash in address to match domain below
Online photo gallery at <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.wading-in.net" target="_blank">www.wading-in.net</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Commercial scanning of color films? 
Back to top
Login to vote
spamctenos

External


Since: Jul 24, 2003
Posts: 3



(Msg. 9) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 11:36 pm
Post subject: Re: Commercial scanning of color films? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

  > > The guy who runs the lab said that slides don't work
  > > in his $60k scanner - wish he'd told me that before!
 >
 > The lab needs to replace the operator, not the scanner.


Just for clarity... I'm not talking about minor color correction. I spent a
decade in the R&D labs of a major photo company, and am fairly handy with
PhotoShop. This is a bizarre effect that I've never seen. Happy to send a
small area of the scans to anyoen who might know what's happening.

The scanner operator is also the shop owner. He clearly doesn't know much
about technical aspects of imaging. He did say that everything he's read
says that scanners like his are NG for slides; further, that no-one shoots
slides anymore so the manufacturers don't care. I'm dubious on both, and may
just spend $50 to get both rolls rescanned somewhere else.

Thanks for all opinions so far. Still interested in thoughts on emulsion
choices - what's best for this low-contrast, high-res application in the
commercial line? I don't use enough to be worth buying Kodak aero emulsions.

-Ctenos<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Commercial scanning of color films? 
Back to top
Login to vote
averagejoe1

External


Since: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: 37



(Msg. 10) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 11:36 pm
Post subject: Re: Commercial scanning of color films? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thv, 24 Jvl 2003 20:36:33 +0000, Ctenos wrote:

 > This is a bizarre effect

it is not bizarre, there are no good open systems scanning for negative,
Kodak does not share the film and systems data for svch to happen, they
patented it all in 1990 with photoCd and are keeping it in closed
propreitary systems, the patents expire in 2007

--
Comrade
see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.mysolvtion.ws" target="_blank">http://www.mysolvtion.ws</a>
the aristocracy was the problem in 1776, the aristocracy is the problem today
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.aclv.org/dissentreport" target="_blank">http://www.aclv.org/dissentreport</a>
Arisocrats CRUCIFIED Jesvs
we mvst close the door by which aristocracy arises

Statements of svpposed science, withovt statistics, are jvst as mvch religion,
and ONLY statements of faith as any religion, or statement of faith,
except they profess the svpposed scientist is God, even more
dangerovs than religion or God. There is no science, withovt a statement of
statistics, AND any statement withovt statistics, is a conjectvre of faith
by the professor of svch statement, and the "believer". An ethical
hovse cleaning of science and government is in order.

"Does God want goodness? or the choice of goodness?
Is the man who chooses bad, somehow better,
than the man who has the good forced vpon him?"
a qvote from the movie, A Clockwork Orange, Kvbrick

Enlightenment is man's release from his self-incvrred tvtelage.
Tvtelage is man's inability to make vse of his vnderstanding
withovt direction from another. Self-incvrred is this tvtelage when
its cavse lies not in lack of reason bvt in lack of resolvtion
and covrage to vse it withovt direction from another. Sapere avde!
"Have covrage to vse yovr own reason!" - that is the motto
of enlightenment.
Kant -- What Is Enlightenment? 1784

"It all svms vp into one single pvrpose,
the abolition of dog-eat-dog vnder which we live...
and I traveled the United Front road to get it."
-- Roger Baldwin, Co-Fovnder ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)

"Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's ovtside, looking in
Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's ovtside, looking in"
MOODY BLUES

"Then Jesvs said vnto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Saddvcees."--Matthew 16:6
(religiovs and political leaders that are hypocrites)

(leaven is yeast, AIR IN BREAD, bvllshit, flvff, marketing, snake oil - HYPOCRISY)

"How is it that ye do not vnderstand that I spake it not to yov concerning bread, that ye shovld beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Saddvcees? Then vnderstood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, bvt of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Saddvcees."--Matthew 16:11-12

"Bvt woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shvt vp the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yovrselves, neither svffer ye them that are entering to go in."--Matthew 23:13

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devovr widows' hovses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."--Matthew 23:14

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yovrselves."--Matthew 23:15

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cvmmin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, jvdgment, mercy, and faith: these ovght ye to have done, and not to leave the other vndone."--Matthew 23:23

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the ovtside of the cvp and of the platter, bvt within they are fvll of extortion and excess."--Matthew 23:25

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like vnto whited sepvlchres, which indeed appear beavtifvl ovtward, bvt are within fvll of dead men's bones, and of all vncleanness."--Matthew 23:27

"Woe vnto yov, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! becavse ye bvild the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepvlchres of the righteovs,"--Matthew 23:29

"And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod."--Mark 8:15

"And he said vnto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and love salvtations in the marketplaces,"--Mark 12:38


see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.mysolvtion.ws" target="_blank">http://www.mysolvtion.ws</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Commercial scanning of color films? 
Back to top
Login to vote
mxsmanic

External


Since: Jun 05, 2004
Posts: 908



(Msg. 11) Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2003 6:04 am
Post subject: Re: Commercial scanning of color films? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Ctenos" <spamctenos RemoveThis @att.net (reply w/o spam)> writes:

 > Happy to send a small area of the scans to anyoen
 > who might know what's happening.

Can you post it on the Web?

 > The scanner operator is also the shop owner. He clearly
 > doesn't know much about technical aspects of imaging.

Uh-huh.

Did he also tell you that the scanner won't scan slides in portrait
orientation?

 > He did say that everything he's read says that scanners
 > like his are NG for slides; further, that no-one shoots
 > slides anymore so the manufacturers don't care.

He's wrong on both counts. Even a moderately good desktop scanner can
scan slides, and high-end desktop scanners (as well as drum scanners)
can handle them easily.

Lots of people shoot slides. Here in Europe, in particular, slide film
is still popular, much more so than in the U.S.

--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Commercial scanning of color films? 
Back to top
Login to vote
some

External


Since: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 148



(Msg. 12) Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2003 1:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Commercial scanning of color films? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

My 2c- comments inline...

On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:39:03 GMT, "Ctenos" <spamctenos.RemoveThis@att.net (reply
w/o spam)> wrote:


 >I had a problem with two rolls of slides, though - the digital images look
 >absolutely awful. Sort of micro-posterized, but not in any rational way. The
 >guy who runs the lab said that slides don't work in his $60k scanner - wish
 >he'd told me that before!
 >
If slides don't work in his $60K scanner then A) he's not the sharpest
person to run a business, B) He ripped himself off, C) He has no idea
what his $60K scanner can do, or ......drum roll..D) He doesn't *have*
a $60K scanner.

As previous responses to this thread have mentioned, even the cheapest
of cheap slide scanners will do a half-decent job of scanning. I'd
recommend you do this yourself. I just sold a Nikon Coolscan IV ED
and replaced it with a Super Coolscan 8000 for $415 bucks on Ebay.
Thats a good scanner! (just didn't provide an MF adapter).

 >Is this a dynamic range problem, or what? Woudl a better lab be able to
 >digitize these two valuable rolls?
 >
Honestly, scan them yourself. Unless you don't want to. Unless this
is a one-off or something, slide/negative scanners always come in use!

 >Also, can anyone recommend "best" 35mm color films for aerial use?
 >
Thats sort of hard to say. I would say you'd need to tell us how far
up you are, how wide your lenses are, and f you're using telephoto's,
etc for close'ish-ups.

I have done some aerial photography using Provia 400F in broad
daylight. I used a faster film because I knew that I was going to be
in a situation where I only had X time (I was in a glider) and I
wanted to be able to shoot this certain property fully zoomed without
blur. I also knew that Provia 400F shot wide would be "good enough"
The pictures came out great- but- no- they didn't look like Ektar 25
or anything- of course...Scanned them at 4000dpi and the client never
had any issues with the work. I shot a roll of APX 100 @100 that day
for fun and at full zoom (f/5.6, 300mm) I was getting 1/60 at about
5,000 feet, 40 knots or so. That was some blurry film.

Live a little, learn a little Smile









 >Thanks very much-
 >
 >Ctenos
 >

Cheers,
-sd
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.zoom.sh" target="_blank">http://www.zoom.sh</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Commercial scanning of color films? 
Back to top
Login to vote
spamctenos

External


Since: Jul 24, 2003
Posts: 3



(Msg. 13) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 6:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Commercial scanning of color films? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Some Dude" <some.RemoveThis@dude.net> wrote in message
news:n8e2ivshsev74jqissa29upe48mq6fn0m2@4ax.com...
 > My 2c- comments inline...
 > ...Honestly, scan them yourself. Unless you don't want to. Unless this
 > is a one-off or something, slide/negative scanners always come in use!
 >
  > >Also, can anyone recommend "best" 35mm color films for aerial use?
  > >
 > Thats sort of hard to say. I would say you'd need to tell us how far
 > up you are, how wide your lenses are, and f you're using telephoto's,
 > etc for close'ish-ups.
 >
 > I have done some aerial photography using Provia 400F in broad
 > daylight. I used a faster film because I knew that I was going to be
 > in a situation where I only had X time (I was in a glider) and I
 > wanted to be able to shoot this certain property fully zoomed without
 > blur. I also knew that Provia 400F shot wide would be "good enough"
 > The pictures came out great- but- no- they didn't look like Ektar 25
 > or anything- of course...Scanned them at 4000dpi and the client never
 > had any issues with the work. I shot a roll of APX 100 @100 that day
 > for fun and at full zoom (f/5.6, 300mm) I was getting 1/60 at about
 > 5,000 feet, 40 knots or so. That was some blurry film.


Thanks for a good posting, SD. FWIW, the scanner is part of an integrated
minilab system, and the shop owner clearly doesn't know a whole lot about
imaging technology. But his scans of my 100 and 400 ASA negative films were
just fine.

I've been doing this for 15 years or so, and have found it cheaper to pay
for scans than buy a scanner of adequate quality. I think that price drops
and quality gains may make it worth taking the plunge now, though.

As to technique - I usually shoot from a helicopter (R22) with my door off.
Cessna 152 is OK, but less flexible (though quieter). Gotta trust that
seatbelt! Being a righty, I always shoot from the left seat. Usually use
fixed-length lenses for speed and sharpness, either a 55 or an 85 mm. Much
wider, and the skid/wing gets into the picture. I usually make four passes
per shoot - one roll each on power wind (nice for stereo pairs) or even with
my old FM2. I usually shoot between the legal minimum and 1200' AGL, with
each orbit at a different height and radius for varying field of view.

I usually shoot 400 ASA to limit vibration issues. (Motion blur is no
problem, only shake.) On lightly overcast days, when it's bright but low
dynamic range, I sometimes use 100 speed for extra detail. A heavy camera
and a light grip reduce vibration.

When I get the pix digitized (or downloaded from a backup 3 MPx digital),
the first thing I do is to open the blue channel in Photoshop and strip sky
haze. Even from only 500', it makes a huge difference. From there, color
correction is pretty easy and mainly a matter of taste. Ditto contrast in
different parts of the curve. Since most people don't know what color things
really are, I usually make the greens a bit bluer and punch up the blue in
any water or sky. I often try to punch up some distinct red, as from maple
buds or yard junk, to round out the gamut.

-Ctenos<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Commercial scanning of color films? 
Back to top
Login to vote
some

External


Since: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 148



(Msg. 14) Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 3:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Commercial scanning of color films? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Comments inline

 >
 >
 >Thanks for a good posting, SD. FWIW, the scanner is part of an integrated
 >minilab system, and the shop owner clearly doesn't know a whole lot about
 >imaging technology. But his scans of my 100 and 400 ASA negative films were
 >just fine.
 >
Uncool about the owner, cool that the scans came out.

 >I've been doing this for 15 years or so, and have found it cheaper to pay
 >for scans than buy a scanner of adequate quality. I think that price drops
 >and quality gains may make it worth taking the plunge now, though.
 >
Yeah I seriously think you should consider a scanner- especially if
this is a profession. You'll save major $$$ quickly.

 >As to technique - I usually shoot from a helicopter (R22) with my door off.
 >Cessna 152 is OK, but less flexible (though quieter). Gotta trust that
 >seatbelt! Being a righty, I always shoot from the left seat. Usually use
 >fixed-length lenses for speed and sharpness, either a 55 or an 85 mm. Much
 >wider, and the skid/wing gets into the picture. I usually make four passes
 >per shoot - one roll each on power wind (nice for stereo pairs) or even with
 >my old FM2. I usually shoot between the legal minimum and 1200' AGL, with
 >each orbit at a different height and radius for varying field of view.
 >
Interesting. You obviously know a lot more than me about shooting
aerial. (which isn't saying much because i've done it like 5 times).
Glad to hear you're using an FM2 Smile I shoot a lot of pro work with an
FE2 and an MD-12.

 >I usually shoot 400 ASA to limit vibration issues. (Motion blur is no
 >problem, only shake.) On lightly overcast days, when it's bright but low
 >dynamic range, I sometimes use 100 speed for extra detail. A heavy camera
 >and a light grip reduce vibration.
 >
You may try a CPL and an ND to help out with with overcast/scatter and
dynamic range issues. But maybe you already do that...

 >When I get the pix digitized (or downloaded from a backup 3 MPx digital),
 >the first thing I do is to open the blue channel in Photoshop and strip sky
 >haze. Even from only 500', it makes a huge difference. From there, color
 >correction is pretty easy and mainly a matter of taste. Ditto contrast in
 >different parts of the curve. Since most people don't know what color things
 >really are, I usually make the greens a bit bluer and punch up the blue in
 >any water or sky. I often try to punch up some distinct red, as from maple
 >buds or yard junk, to round out the gamut.
 >
Yeah digitals, depending on what kind you have, although sort of not
dependent either, have a terrible time with blue. Always have. Some
of the newer dig SLR's like the D100, D1x, d1h, etc seem to have
figured that part out. My little dinky powershot s45 does a pretty
good job representing blue but it still has registration issues
(scattering, fading) with other colors. say, trees on sky.

I'm thinking what you really need- assuming you can afford it (and
believe in it) is a good Nikon Digital SLR that you can use your old
lenses with. The D100 is down to around $1600 for the body. Thats
damn good! Wink

Hope this helps..


 >-Ctenos
 >

Cheers,
-sd
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.zoom.sh" target="_blank">http://www.zoom.sh</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Commercial scanning of color films? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> Film & Lab All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]