Welcome to PhotoForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly

 
Goto page 1, 2
   Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> General RSS
Next:  Simple question: How to retain file size after ju..  
Author Message
John Smith

External


Since: May 11, 2007
Posts: 32



(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 8:41 pm
Post subject: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly
Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital>slr-systems, others (more info?)

As one who's upgraded over the years from a D100 to a D2Xs and now to a D3,
my D3 seems to be much more prone to dust on the sensor.

I've dealt with it before and sensor cleaning was easy and worked quite well
using a simple ear syringe along with Nikon's recommended cleaning process
using the EH-6 AC Adapter.

The dust spots seem harder to get rid of on my D3 using this same exact
process. Have other D3 owners noticed the same?

One more question: Samys Camera here in Los Angeles recommended the "Arctic
Butterfly" sensor cleaner. Has anyone tried it, and if so, what has your
experience been?

Thanks,
John

 >> Stay informed about: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly 
Back to top
Login to vote
RichA

External


Since: Apr 29, 2007
Posts: 362



(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Feb 24, 11:41 pm, "John Smith" <JohnSm....RemoveThis@aol.com> wrote:
> As one who's upgraded over the years from a D100 to a D2Xs and now to a D3,
> my D3 seems to be much more prone to dust on the sensor.
>

Pretty much what the Canon FF users found. Ironic though, given
diffraction as an issue is less of a problem on a large sensor camera
than a smaller one, yet dust (visible dust) seems to be worse with FF
images.

 >> Stay informed about: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly 
Back to top
Login to vote
Bob G

External


Since: Dec 29, 2007
Posts: 6



(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:38 am
Post subject: Re: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

.... dust (visible dust) seems to be worse with FF
> images.


What's FF?

Is it really that difficult and time-consuming to spell it out?

Pretty soon we'll all be speaking in acronyms.

jfud hfgt aj ngh?
 >> Stay informed about: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly 
Back to top
Login to vote
John Smith

External


Since: May 11, 2007
Posts: 32



(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 8:41 am
Post subject: Re: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

FF = Full Frame (sensor) as opposed to DX format. Nikon actually uses the
acronym "FX" for their full frame sensor, but it's usually abbreviated to
FF.



"Bob G" <bobjames27.DeleteThis@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:cbff73c4-49ed-4646-b5a9-3a0a3fd6089d@v3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> ... dust (visible dust) seems to be worse with FF
>> images.
>
>
> What's FF?
>
> Is it really that difficult and time-consuming to spell it out?
>
> Pretty soon we'll all be speaking in acronyms.
>
> jfud hfgt aj ngh?
 >> Stay informed about: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly 
Back to top
Login to vote
RichA

External


Since: Apr 29, 2007
Posts: 362



(Msg. 5) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 9:31 am
Post subject: Re: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Feb 26, 10:38 am, Bob G <bobjame....RemoveThis@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> ... dust (visible dust) seems to be worse with FF
>
> > images.
>
> What's FF?
>
> Is it really that difficult and time-consuming to spell it out?
>
> Pretty soon we'll all be speaking in acronyms.
>
> jfud hfgt aj ngh?

FF = Full Frame is an unfortunate designation. The real definition
should be 35mm sensor size, as FF is purely arbitrary, based on a FILM
standard from 1911.
The old geezers of the photo community would cry like childen if some
company released a different size (larger) because their ancient
legacy film lenses would no longer work.
 >> Stay informed about: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly 
Back to top
Login to vote
John Smith

External


Since: May 11, 2007
Posts: 32



(Msg. 6) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 9:36 am
Post subject: Re: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

There ARE larger sizes you young dweeb. It's called medium format, large
format.

Ever seen a 20x24 large format FILM camera. Now, there's some Gigapixels!

Get educated: http://wisner.com/Page13.html



"RichA" <rander3127.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8a5d133a-2333-419d-a29a-860dd0983ed2@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 26, 10:38 am, Bob G <bobjame....RemoveThis@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> ... dust (visible dust) seems to be worse with FF
>>
>> > images.
>>
>> What's FF?
>>
>> Is it really that difficult and time-consuming to spell it out?
>>
>> Pretty soon we'll all be speaking in acronyms.
>>
>> jfud hfgt aj ngh?
>
> FF = Full Frame is an unfortunate designation. The real definition
> should be 35mm sensor size, as FF is purely arbitrary, based on a FILM
> standard from 1911.
> The old geezers of the photo community would cry like childen if some
> company released a different size (larger) because their ancient
> legacy film lenses would no longer work.
>
 >> Stay informed about: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly 
Back to top
Login to vote
TRoss

External


Since: Aug 01, 2007
Posts: 51



(Msg. 7) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 12:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:31:51 -0800 (PST), RichA <rander3127 DeleteThis @gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Feb 26, 10:38 am, Bob G <bobjame... DeleteThis @sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> ... dust (visible dust) seems to be worse with FF
>>
>> > images.
>>
>> What's FF?
>>
>> Is it really that difficult and time-consuming to spell it out?
>>
>> Pretty soon we'll all be speaking in acronyms.
>>
>> jfud hfgt aj ngh?
>
>FF = Full Frame is an unfortunate designation. The real definition
>should be 35mm sensor size, as FF is purely arbitrary, based on a FILM
>standard from 1911.
>The old geezers of the photo community would cry like childen if some
>company released a different size (larger) because their ancient
>legacy film lenses would no longer work.

You may be surprised to learn that there are several medium and large
format digital cameras on the market. Hasselblad, Rollei, Mamiya,
Fuji, Leaf, Phase One, BetterLight, Imacon to name a few.

Not that you would let facts get in the way of one of your idiotic
rants.....

TR
 >> Stay informed about: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly 
Back to top
Login to vote
Adrian Boliston

External


Since: Jul 30, 2006
Posts: 224



(Msg. 8) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 12:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Bob G" <bobjames27.DeleteThis@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:cbff73c4-49ed-4646-b5a9-3a0a3fd6089d@v3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

> ... dust (visible dust) seems to be worse with FF
>> images.
>
>
> What's FF?
>
> Is it really that difficult and time-consuming to spell it out?
>
> Pretty soon we'll all be speaking in acronyms.
>
> jfud hfgt aj ngh?

People keep calling a digital single lens reflex camera a "DSLR", bloody
frustrating!
 >> Stay informed about: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly 
Back to top
Login to vote
Neil Ellwood

External


Since: Dec 26, 2007
Posts: 38



(Msg. 9) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 2:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:04:33 -0600, TRoss wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:31:51 -0800 (PST), RichA <rander3127.DeleteThis@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 26, 10:38 am, Bob G <bobjame....DeleteThis@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>> ... dust (visible dust) seems to be worse with FF
>>>
>>> > images.
>>>
>>> What's FF?
>>>
>>> Is it really that difficult and time-consuming to spell it out?
>>>
>>> Pretty soon we'll all be speaking in acronyms.
>>>
>>> jfud hfgt aj ngh?
>>
>>FF = Full Frame is an unfortunate designation. The real definition
>>should be 35mm sensor size, as FF is purely arbitrary, based on a FILM
>>standard from 1911.
>>The old geezers of the photo community would cry like childen if some
>>company released a different size (larger) because their ancient legacy
>>film lenses would no longer work.
>
> You may be surprised to learn that there are several medium and large
> format digital cameras on the market. Hasselblad, Rollei, Mamiya, Fuji,
> Leaf, Phase One, BetterLight, Imacon to name a few.
>
> Not that you would let facts get in the way of one of your idiotic
> rants.....
>
> TR

You forgot to point out that Oscar Barnack didn't sell his camera
commercially until somewhere around 1927.

--
Neil
reverse ra and delete l
Linux user 335851
 >> Stay informed about: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly 
Back to top
Login to vote
Rita Berkowitz

External


Since: Jan 06, 2008
Posts: 296



(Msg. 10) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: aus>photo, others (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
Jürgen Exner

External


Since: Dec 18, 2007
Posts: 182



(Msg. 11) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 6:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital>slr-systems, others (more info?)

RichA <rander3127 DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>On Feb 26, 10:38 am, Bob G <bobjame... DeleteThis @sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> What's FF?
>
>FF = Full Frame is an unfortunate designation. The real definition
>should be 35mm sensor size, as FF is purely arbitrary, based on a FILM
>standard from 1911.

The real designation is Kleinbildformat as it was used in 1913 by Oskar
Barnack when he developed the very first Leica camera for Leitz.
The literal translation would be small picture/image format which matches
very nicely with the terms medium frame and large frame camera.

jue
 >> Stay informed about: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly 
Back to top
Login to vote
John Smith

External


Since: May 11, 2007
Posts: 32



(Msg. 12) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 6:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Vielen Dank Herr Jurgen! Ganz nett von dir!



"Jürgen Exner" <jurgenex.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:05l8s3p9gpsfe7jok1j0rgdfgdbb6k0330@4ax.com...
> RichA <rander3127.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Feb 26, 10:38 am, Bob G <bobjame....TakeThisOut@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>> What's FF?
>>
>>FF = Full Frame is an unfortunate designation. The real definition
>>should be 35mm sensor size, as FF is purely arbitrary, based on a FILM
>>standard from 1911.
>
> The real designation is Kleinbildformat as it was used in 1913 by Oskar
> Barnack when he developed the very first Leica camera for Leitz.
> The literal translation would be small picture/image format which matches
> very nicely with the terms medium frame and large frame camera.
>
> jue
 >> Stay informed about: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly 
Back to top
Login to vote
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios

External


Since: Dec 04, 2006
Posts: 148



(Msg. 13) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Ï "John Smith" <JohnSmith RemoveThis @aol.com> Ýãñáøå óôï ìÞíõìá
news:bxZwj.757$0G7.349@newsfe10.phx...
> Vielen Dank Herr Jurgen! Ganz nett von dir!
>
>
Ach, Du sprichst auch Deutsch?
>
> "Jürgen Exner" <jurgenex RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:05l8s3p9gpsfe7jok1j0rgdfgdbb6k0330@4ax.com...
> > RichA <rander3127 RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> >>On Feb 26, 10:38 am, Bob G <bobjame... RemoveThis @sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >>> What's FF?
> >>
> >>FF = Full Frame is an unfortunate designation. The real definition
> >>should be 35mm sensor size, as FF is purely arbitrary, based on a FILM
> >>standard from 1911.
> >
> > The real designation is Kleinbildformat as it was used in 1913 by Oskar
> > Barnack when he developed the very first Leica camera for Leitz.
> > The literal translation would be small picture/image format which
matches
> > very nicely with the terms medium frame and large frame camera.
> >
Kleinbildformat, Spiegelreflexkamera, Objektiv und so weiter:-)
>
>



--
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios
major in electrical engineering
mechanized infantry reservist
hordad AT otenet DOT gr
 >> Stay informed about: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly 
Back to top
Login to vote
John Smith

External


Since: May 11, 2007
Posts: 32



(Msg. 14) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Jürgen,

Genau meiner Freund, aber es ist eine sehr lange Zeit seit Ich Deutsch
gesprochen habe! Ich habe in Goettingen in 1972-1973 als ein Student der
"University of California Education Abroad Program" studierte. Es war eine
ausgezeichnete Erlebnis, aber meine Vortschatz ist nur so Schwach!

I hope I didn't say anything TOO stupid above. <s> I would love to find a
way to revice my German here in southern California!

Tschuss!


"Tzortzakakis Dimitrios" <nowhere.TakeThisOut@noone.com> wrote in message
news:fq1s86$ll1$1@mouse.otenet.gr...
>
> Ï "John Smith" <JohnSmith.TakeThisOut@aol.com> Ýãñáøå óôï ìÞíõìá
> news:bxZwj.757$0G7.349@newsfe10.phx...
>> Vielen Dank Herr Jurgen! Ganz nett von dir!
>>
>>
> Ach, Du sprichst auch Deutsch?
>>
>> "Jürgen Exner" <jurgenex.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:05l8s3p9gpsfe7jok1j0rgdfgdbb6k0330@4ax.com...
>> > RichA <rander3127.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>On Feb 26, 10:38 am, Bob G <bobjame....TakeThisOut@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> >>> What's FF?
>> >>
>> >>FF = Full Frame is an unfortunate designation. The real definition
>> >>should be 35mm sensor size, as FF is purely arbitrary, based on a FILM
>> >>standard from 1911.
>> >
>> > The real designation is Kleinbildformat as it was used in 1913 by Oskar
>> > Barnack when he developed the very first Leica camera for Leitz.
>> > The literal translation would be small picture/image format which
> matches
>> > very nicely with the terms medium frame and large frame camera.
>> >
> Kleinbildformat, Spiegelreflexkamera, Objektiv und so weiter:-)
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tzortzakakis Dimitrios
> major in electrical engineering
> mechanized infantry reservist
> hordad AT otenet DOT gr
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly 
Back to top
Login to vote
AlanW

External


Since: Jan 13, 2007
Posts: 18



(Msg. 15) Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 8:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Cleaning my D3 sensor / Arctic Butterfly [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: rec>photo>digital (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> General All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page 1, 2
Page 1 of 2

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]