Welcome to PhotoForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Regarding G Clarons

 
   Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> Large Format RSS
Next:  Pictures do not display on camera  
Author Message
neil2

External


Since: Dec 06, 2004
Posts: 8



(Msg. 1) Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 9:40 am
Post subject: Regarding G Clarons
Archived from groups: rec>photo>equipment>large-format (more info?)

I already have two of the regular type (150/9 & 210/9).
I know there are also 240, 270 & 305mm G Clarons.
Now I have seen a 240mm f11 G Claron WA.
Are they a special variant with greater coverage?

I intend the 150mm for my Crown Graphic and the 210mm will be for my
Linhof. Schneider seem to be very conservative regarding the coverage at
infinity with these lenses.

 >> Stay informed about: Regarding G Clarons 
Back to top
Login to vote
Nick Zentena

External


Since: Jan 29, 2005
Posts: 58



(Msg. 2) Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 10:28 am
Post subject: Re: Regarding G Clarons [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Neil Purling <neil RemoveThis @sextant.karoo.co.uk> wrote:
 > I already have two of the regular type (150/9 & 210/9).
 > I know there are also 240, 270 & 305mm G Clarons.
 > Now I have seen a 240mm f11 G Claron WA.
 > Are they a special variant with greater coverage?


To the best of my memory the WA are a totally different lens. They may not
fit shutters either. You'll find once you start looking at the 305mm and
bigger the prices jump. 150mm can be very cheap. I've never been lucky
enough to find a cheap 305mm or 355mm.

Nick<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

 >> Stay informed about: Regarding G Clarons 
Back to top
Login to vote
neil2

External


Since: Dec 06, 2004
Posts: 8



(Msg. 3) Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Regarding G Clarons [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

What design would give greater coverage than a Plasmat type?
I dismantled my 210mm to extract the two cells from the barrel and test
fitted them in a #1 Compur.
I know they fit.
There are Repro-Clarons as well.
Why would they make versions of the types with different threads so they
wouldnt fit a shutter?
 >> Stay informed about: Regarding G Clarons 
Back to top
Login to vote
Nick Zentena

External


Since: Jan 29, 2005
Posts: 58



(Msg. 4) Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 2:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Regarding G Clarons [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Neil Purling <neil.TakeThisOut@sextant.karoo.co.uk> wrote:
 > What design would give greater coverage than a Plasmat type?

If you look at something like the 120mm Nikon F/8 it basically covers 8x10
with 310mm of coverage. OTOH a 150mm Claron is supposed to be about 250mm.
Shorter lens but greater total coverage. Plenty of other modern wide angle
lenses will beat the 80degrees of coverage that the Claron provides. Plus
some older ones.


 > I dismantled my 210mm to extract the two cells from the barrel and test
 > fitted them in a #1 Compur.
 > I know they fit.
 > There are Repro-Clarons as well.
 > Why would they make versions of the types with different threads so they
 > wouldnt fit a shutter?


Turn the question around. Why go to the trouble of making a lens to fit a
shutter? I know Scheinder sold G-claron in shutters so it makes sense to
make them fit. But I don't think they ever sold the WA in a shutter so why
go to the trouble?

Nick<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Regarding G Clarons 
Back to top
Login to vote
neil2

External


Since: Dec 06, 2004
Posts: 8



(Msg. 5) Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:40 am
Post subject: Re: Regarding G Clarons [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Nick said
 >Why go to the trouble of making a lens to fit a shutter?

If there are versions of the exact same lens, some which fit a shutter and
some that do not why complicate manufacture with non standard parts?

If the 150mm G Claron may have 80degrees of coverage how much of that is
truly sharp?
I have heard that the 150mm will cover 5x7 yet Schneider themelves are very
conservative.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Regarding G Clarons 
Back to top
Login to vote
Nick Zentena

External


Since: Jan 29, 2005
Posts: 58



(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:12 am
Post subject: Re: Regarding G Clarons [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Neil Purling <neil.DeleteThis@sextant.karoo.co.uk> wrote:
 > Nick said
  >>Why go to the trouble of making a lens to fit a shutter?
 >
 > If there are versions of the exact same lens, some which fit a shutter and
 > some that do not why complicate manufacture with non standard parts?


The WA isn't the same lens. At least I'm fairly sure it isn't.

Nick<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Regarding G Clarons 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> Large Format All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]