Canon EOS 1D Mark II N

FAQ

Profile

Canon EOS 1D Mark II N

Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> Digital SLR

Next: An ISO Quality question

Author

Message

l e o

External

Since: Nov 29, 2006
Posts: 87

(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 4:17 am
Post subject: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N
Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital>slr-systems (more info?)

From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has?
I guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full
frame. Plot is getting thick.

>> Stay informed about: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N

none24

External

Since: Dec 08, 2004
Posts: 374

(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 4:17 am Post subject: Re: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 04:17:33 GMT, l e o <someone DeleteThis @somewhere.net> wrote: > From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has? >I guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full >frame. Plot is getting thick. Someone got clever and used the "liquify" feature in PS to create it out of a 20D. -Rich >> Stay informed about: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N

Canongirly

External

Since: Jun 14, 2005
Posts: 8

(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:46 am Post subject: Re: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

WHO CARES?!! "l e o" <someone RemoveThis @somewhere.net> wrote in message news:xjAKe.4314$RS.3767@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... > From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has? I > guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full frame. > Plot is getting thick. >> Stay informed about: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N

Rox-off

External

Since: Jul 06, 2005
Posts: 54

(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 9:49 am Post subject: Re: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 04:17:33 +0000, l e o wrote: > From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has? > I guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full > frame. Plot is getting thick. Thick like you. -- Save photography \| shoot some film today! email: drop rods and insert surfaces >> Stay informed about: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N

l e o

External

Since: Nov 29, 2006
Posts: 87

(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:12 pm Post subject: Re: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

l e o wrote: > From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has? > I guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full > frame. Plot is getting thick. Funny, all three Canon bashers have been captured. >> Stay informed about: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N

Rox-off

External

Since: Jul 06, 2005
Posts: 54

(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 2:46 pm Post subject: Re: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:12:15 +0000, l e o wrote: > l e o wrote: >> From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has? >> I guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full >> frame. Plot is getting thick. > > > Funny, all three Canon bashers have been captured. Funny as in "ha-ha" funny, or funny as in "queer" funny? I don't bash Canon all that much. Just the lamers who think they have somehow bought into a better line of products when they proudly announce how "superior" Canon is. Fortunately I have extensive experience with both systems, unlike most other protagonists on these forums. -- Save photography \| shoot some film today! email: drop rods and insert surfaces >> Stay informed about: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N

l e o

External

Since: Nov 29, 2006
Posts: 87

(Msg. 7) Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:29 pm Post subject: Re: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Rox-off wrote: > On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:12:15 +0000, l e o wrote: > > >>l e o wrote: >> >>> From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has? >>>I guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full >>>frame. Plot is getting thick. >> >> >>Funny, all three Canon bashers have been captured. > > > Funny as in "ha-ha" funny, or funny as in "queer" funny? > > I don't bash Canon all that much. Just the lamers who think they have > somehow bought into a better line of products when they proudly announce > how "superior" Canon is. Fortunately I have extensive experience with both > systems, unlike most other protagonists on these forums. At least a civilized person, like me, don't bash Nikon. >> Stay informed about: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N

Darrell

External

Since: Apr 22, 2005
Posts: 105

(Msg. 8) Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:29 pm Post subject: Re: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

The PDF is a HOAX and the mark II N is also a hoax. It is unlikey Canon would use a KM Trademark "l e o" <someone DeleteThis @somewhere.net> wrote in message news:rbRKe.4724$RS.2367@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... > Rox-off wrote: >> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:12:15 +0000, l e o wrote: >> >> >>>l e o wrote: >>> >>>> From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has? >>>>I guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full >>>>frame. Plot is getting thick. >>> >>> >>>Funny, all three Canon bashers have been captured. >> >> >> Funny as in "ha-ha" funny, or funny as in "queer" funny? I don't bash >> Canon all that much. Just the lamers who think they have >> somehow bought into a better line of products when they proudly announce >> how "superior" Canon is. Fortunately I have extensive experience with >> both >> systems, unlike most other protagonists on these forums. > > > At least a civilized person, like me, don't bash Nikon. >> Stay informed about: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N

Darrell

External

Since: Apr 22, 2005
Posts: 105

(Msg. 9) Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:29 pm Post subject: Re: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Brian Baird" <no.DeleteThis@no.thank.u> wrote in message news:MPG.1d65dc22ca84fa329897f2@news.verizon.net... > In article <6sGdnQ7JWv2IeGbfRVn-1A.DeleteThis@rogers.com>, spam.DeleteThis@this.eh says... >> It is unlikey Canon >> would use a KM Trademark > > You can't trademark "5D." Too broad. > > "EOS 5D" or "Maxxum 5D" are a different matter entirely... > There are at least two trademarks 5D registered on the USPTO, neither is for a camera. Why would Canon then chose to call a camera after a known entry-level product. 5D has been known as long as the 7D (also 9D) Is Canon marketing really that bad? What is happening on August 22, 2005? There will be a Nikon D200 announced sometime this year, but I don't see why they would issue a "full-frame" dSLR and a mk.II N which would presumably be a 1.3X FOV. Somebody is pulling someone's leg on this one. >> Stay informed about: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N

l e o

External

Since: Nov 29, 2006
Posts: 87

(Msg. 10) Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 4:23 am Post subject: Re: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Brian Baird wrote: > In article <bsednX1SLv6wiGHfRVn-gQ.RemoveThis@rogers.com>, spam.RemoveThis@this.eh says... > >>"Brian Baird" <no.RemoveThis@no.thank.u> wrote in message >>news:MPG.1d65dc22ca84fa329897f2@news.verizon.net... >> >>>In article <6sGdnQ7JWv2IeGbfRVn-1A.RemoveThis@rogers.com>, spam.RemoveThis@this.eh says... >>> >>>>It is unlikey Canon >>>>would use a KM Trademark >>> >>>You can't trademark "5D." Too broad. >>> >>>"EOS 5D" or "Maxxum 5D" are a different matter entirely... >>> >> >>There are at least two trademarks 5D registered on the USPTO, neither is for >>a camera. Why would Canon then chose to call a camera after a known >>entry-level product. 5D has been known as long as the 7D (also 9D) Is Canon >>marketing really that bad? >> >>What is happening on August 22, 2005? There will be a Nikon D200 announced >>sometime this year, but I don't see why they would issue a "full-frame" dSLR >>and a mk.II N which would presumably be a 1.3X FOV. Somebody is pulling >>someone's leg on this one. > > > I'm not holding my breath. It would be interesting if a full frame dSLR > came in at 12 megapixels and under $5000. Certainly would put a crunch > on Nikon to go full-frame. We are "pretty" certain Canon can deliver a full frame dSLR at 12 megapixels and under $5000 (maybe be even $3500). BUT for a 1DMK2, it has to be able to handle at least 8.3fps. It might not yet be possible with the current DIGIC II processor. Is DIGIC III coming up? My guess is it'll be just minor update. The next 1DMK3 will likely merge 1Ds (full frame) and 1D (fast frame rate) using the D2X technique. >> Stay informed about: Canon EOS 1D Mark II N

Display posts from previous:

	Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> Digital SLR	All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum