Welcome to PhotoForumz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Canon vs. Canon

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
   Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> Digital SLR RSS
Next:  This site contains sexually explicit material int..  
Author Message
ozcvgtt02

External


Since: Dec 13, 2004
Posts: 840



(Msg. 31) Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Canon vs. Canon [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>photo>digital>slr-systems (more info?)

Archibald <Archibald RemoveThis @spamhater.com> wrote:

> I bought the Canon 50mm/1.8 and am disappointed with it. It's supposed
> to be so sharp, but it isn't

It couldn't be that the lens is misfocussing?

> and my 17-55mm zoom outperforms it.

at f/1.8.

> Times have changed. You need to get your mind away from the 35mm
> format, away from prime lenses (except for macro), and away from
> manual focus.

Based on 2 fixed-focal length lenses and one zoom you declare
that all zooms are better that fixed-focal lenses?

So the 100-400mm f/4-5.6 is better than the 300mm f/2.8, right?

-Wolfgang

 >> Stay informed about: Canon vs. Canon 
Back to top
Login to vote
Archibald

External


Since: Mar 04, 2008
Posts: 3



(Msg. 32) Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 3:42 am
Post subject: Re: Canon vs. Canon [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 20:51:19 +0100, Wolfgang Weisselberg
<ozcvgtt02 RemoveThis @sneakemail.com> wrote:

>Archibald <Archibald RemoveThis @spamhater.com> wrote:
>
>> I bought the Canon 50mm/1.8 and am disappointed with it. It's supposed
>> to be so sharp, but it isn't
>
>It couldn't be that the lens is misfocussing?
>
>> and my 17-55mm zoom outperforms it.
>
>at f/1.8.
>
>> Times have changed. You need to get your mind away from the 35mm
>> format, away from prime lenses (except for macro), and away from
>> manual focus.
>
>Based on 2 fixed-focal length lenses and one zoom you declare
>that all zooms are better that fixed-focal lenses?

Is that what I said?

Idiot.

Archibald

 >> Stay informed about: Canon vs. Canon 
Back to top
Login to vote
ozcvgtt02

External


Since: Dec 13, 2004
Posts: 840



(Msg. 33) Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 3:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Canon vs. Canon [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Archibald <Archibald.RemoveThis@spamhater.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 20:51:19 +0100, Wolfgang Weisselberg
>>Archibald <Archibald.RemoveThis@spamhater.com> wrote:

>>> Times have changed. You need to get your mind away from the 35mm
>>> format, away from prime lenses (except for macro), and away from
>>> manual focus.

>>Based on 2 fixed-focal length lenses and one zoom you declare
>>that all zooms are better that fixed-focal lenses?

> Is that what I said?

It is what you wrote.

> Idiot.

You and me, we're not even the same species.
(Moritz Muehlenhoff)

-Wolfgang
 >> Stay informed about: Canon vs. Canon 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Digital Photography Tip (Home) -> Digital SLR All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]