Kibo informs me that Andy Davidson <$andy$@nosignal.org> stated that:
>[Earl Misanchuk wrote in rec.photo.moderated]
>> Can anyone please point me to authoritative information on the differences
>> between CMOSes and CCDs? Which will give me the better picture, and why?
>
>CMOS sensors are less power hungry and cheaper to make. I think CCDs still
>have better noise performance (i.e. smoother images.)
The really important difference is that CMOS sensors can include
processing cirtuitry on the same chip. This lowers costs, improves
matching & improves thermal tracking. It can also lower noise by
allowing on-chip conditioning circuitry.
As a general rule, dollar-for-dollar, you'll currently get a better
picture from a CMOS sensor than from a CCD sensor.
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: CCD vs CMOS?