"Douglas" <decipleofeos RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.04.29.11.12.28.391000@yahoo.com...
> It's odd that I bought 2, 20Ds last year and both needed to have the back
> focus calibrated. One focused forward of the focus point and the other aft
> of it. I thought because they had similar serial numbers they might have
> been from a "made on monday" batch but recently I've come across others
> who also have focus problems and the latest 20D I bought is out of focus
> too.
>
> When I took this one back to Canon, the female I gave it to with
> copies of the charts showing the problem couldn't have cared less when I
> told her I couldn't afford to be without this 'new' camera for the
> six weeks she quoted for the adjustment. I guess I'll have to decide to
> either stand douwn one photographer or buy another camera for her and use
> this as a spare when it comes back. This happened at Christmas and I don't
> feel like repeating the fiascoe.
>
> It seems to me thatCanon SLRs are poorly made and even more poorly
> serviced - in Australia at any rate. Anyone have any experiences to add?
>
> Douglas
I wonder if some 20Ds have the autofocus sensor slightly higher or lower
than the target on the focussing screen, or is the vertical height of the
sensor large enough that it might focus on a line other than the one in the
vertical center of the frame? It seems that everyone who is reporting
problems with back focus is using a test chart slanted relative to the focal
plane. This would be a definate problem if the central, cross shaped sensor
is being used for the autofocus test.
It would seem like a more valid test to focus on a test target that is
parallel to the focal plane and then compare the blown-up auto and manual
focus digital images.
Dean
>> Stay informed about: How many 20Ds have had auto focus calibrated